Skip to content

Conversation

@WHUweiqingzhou
Copy link
Collaborator

@WHUweiqingzhou WHUweiqingzhou commented Nov 24, 2023

Linked Issue

Fix #3225 after PR #3226

What's changed?

Before: use simple sum in mix_rho_recip_new
Now: reuse hartree-like sum to cooperate with get_drho()

Any changes of core modules? (ignore if not applicable)

calculated results may be changed.

Please Notes:
I find some old ref-data in current CI refers to wrong magnetic configuration. For example:
in 104_PW_AF_magnetic, in result.ref, we have etotref -5866.174728188967
This energy refers to non-magnetic configuration instead of FM.
Same wrong results appear in 104_PW_FM_magnetic, and 127_PW_15_PK_AF.
To correct these errors, I will change INPUT and make corresponding replacement of result.ref.

Copy link
Collaborator

@Qianruipku Qianruipku left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please check new warnings and update results.

@WHUweiqingzhou
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Please check new warnings and update results.
OK. I will do this.

@Qianruipku Qianruipku merged commit 67412ea into deepmodeling:develop Nov 28, 2023
@WHUweiqingzhou WHUweiqingzhou deleted the tmp branch December 4, 2023 02:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Feature: mix charge density and magnetic density separately

2 participants