docs: fix referenced argument func #79
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@njzjz has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 8 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe documentation for the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Sphinx
participant dargs
User->>Sphinx: Request documentation
Sphinx->>dargs: Retrieve function details
dargs-->>Sphinx: Provide details for test_arguments
Sphinx-->>User: Display updated documentation with test_arguments
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
docs/sphinx.rst (1)
Line range hint
48-58: Update remaining references to match the new function name.The cross-referencing examples and index page section still use
test_argumentinstead oftest_arguments. These should be updated for consistency.Apply these changes:
- Both :dargs:argument:`this <test/test_argument>` and :ref:`this <test/test_argument>` will create a cross-reference to the argument! + Both :dargs:argument:`this <test/test_arguments>` and :ref:`this <test/test_arguments>` will create a cross-reference to the argument! It will be rendered as: - Both :dargs:argument:`this <test/test_argument>` and :ref:`this <test/test_argument>` will create a cross-reference to the argument! + Both :dargs:argument:`this <test/test_arguments>` and :ref:`this <test/test_arguments>` will create a cross-reference to the argument! Index page ---------- -The arguments will be added into the :ref:`genindex` page. See :ref:`test_argument <test/test_argument>` in the :ref:`genindex` page. +The arguments will be added into the :ref:`genindex` page. See :ref:`test_arguments <test/test_arguments>` in the :ref:`genindex` page.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- docs/sphinx.rst (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/sphinx.rst (1)
19-19: LGTM! Function name correctly updated.The function name has been properly updated from
test_argumenttotest_argumentsin these sections.Also applies to: 25-25, 40-40
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #79 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 78.49% 78.49%
=======================================
Files 9 9
Lines 758 758
=======================================
Hits 595 595
Misses 163 163 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Summary by CodeRabbit
test_argumentsinstead oftest_argumentfor clarity and consistency.