fix: fix UnboundLocalError in _select_by_model_devi_standard

[njzjz]

Fix #1586.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Fixed an issue where detailed reports were not generated under certain conditions by ensuring fp_rest_accurate and fp_rest_failed lists are always initialized.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in dpgen/generator/run.py involve removing the conditional initialization of fp_rest_accurate and fp_rest_failed lists. These lists are now always initialized, preventing potential UnboundLocalError exceptions when they are referenced later in the code, particularly in the _select_by_model_devi_standard function.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
dpgen/generator/run.py	Removed conditional initialization of fp_rest_accurate and fp_rest_failed lists, making them always initialized.

Sequence Diagram(s)

N/A

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Prevent UnboundLocalError for fp_rest_accurate variable	✅
Prevent UnboundLocalError for fp_rest_failed variable	✅

---

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 13dc51f and 4462db6.

Files selected for processing (1)

• dpgen/generator/run.py (1 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (1)

dpgen/generator/run.py (1)

2348-2349: LGTM! Ensure the function usage is verified in the codebase.

The code changes are approved. Initializing fp_rest_accurate and fp_rest_failed unconditionally prevents the UnboundLocalError.

However, ensure that all function calls to _select_by_model_devi_standard are compatible with the new initialization.

Verification successful

---

Function usage verified and compatible with the new initialization.

The changes to initialize fp_rest_accurate and fp_rest_failed unconditionally are compatible with the existing function call to _select_by_model_devi_standard. The function usage has been verified and no issues were found.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `_select_by_model_devi_standard` are compatible with the new initialization.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only compatible usages.
rg --type python -A 5 $'_select_by_model_devi_standard'

Length of output: 85

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `_select_by_model_devi_standard` are compatible with the new initialization.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only compatible usages.
rg --glob "*.py" -A 5 $'_select_by_model_devi_standard'

Length of output: 728

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract more lines around the call to `_select_by_model_devi_standard` for thorough review.

# Test: Search for the function usage and extract additional context lines.
rg --glob "*.py" -A 10 -B 10 $'_select_by_model_devi_standard'

Length of output: 2561

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 49.59%. Comparing base (13dc51f) to head (4462db6).
Report is 26 commits behind head on devel.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #1587      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   49.59%   49.59%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          83       83              
  Lines       14852    14851       -1     
==========================================
- Hits         7366     7365       -1     
  Misses       7486     7486              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.