forked from ethereum-optimism/optimism
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: improve superc20 invariant #11
Merged
0xDiscotech
merged 4 commits into
sc/superchain-erc20
from
test/improve-superc20-invariant
Aug 8, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5b8b0aa
refactor: improve assertions on superc20 invariant tests
0xDiscotech e5cac07
chore: remove assert string
0xDiscotech 36529c3
feat: add autogen invariant docs file
0xDiscotech fbbbe54
chore: enhance invariant tests natspec and fix typos
0xDiscotech File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
9 changes: 7 additions & 2 deletions
9
packages/contracts-bedrock/invariant-docs/OptimismSuperchainERC20.md
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,5 +1,10 @@ | ||
# `OptimismSuperchainERC20` Invariants | ||
|
||
## Calls to sendERC20 should always succeed as long as the actor has enough balance. Actor's balance should also not increase out of nowhere. | ||
**Test:** [`OptimismSuperchainERC20.t.sol#L177`](../test/invariants/OptimismSuperchainERC20.t.sol#L177) | ||
## Calls to sendERC20 should always succeed as long as the actor has enough balance. Actor's balance should also not increase out of nowhere but instead should decrease by the amount sent. | ||
**Test:** [`OptimismSuperchainERC20.t.sol#L194`](../test/invariants/OptimismSuperchainERC20.t.sol#L194) | ||
|
||
|
||
|
||
## Calls to relayERC20 should always succeeds when a message is received from another chain. Actor's balance should only increase by the amount relayed. | ||
**Test:** [`OptimismSuperchainERC20.t.sol#L212`](../test/invariants/OptimismSuperchainERC20.t.sol#L212) | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Arent we testing the same as
invariant_sendERC20_succeeds
? With only 1 assert being differentThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not exactly, there are 2 assertions being different, and to me is cleaner to have them separately since those are different flows