Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

don't pad 4 digit tracts and change column names to start with census… #25

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 18, 2022

Conversation

erikarasnick
Copy link
Member

… instead of fips

@erikarasnick erikarasnick linked an issue Jul 13, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
@erikarasnick
Copy link
Member Author

should this be 0.5.2 or 0.6.0? It's technically a bug fix but I wasn't sure since it will change the output.

Copy link
Member

@cole-brokamp cole-brokamp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

0.6.0 sounds good to me. See my comment about the README and clarification around identifiers.

Let's also combine the info in "Geomarker Methods" into the "Geomarker Data" subsection in the README. I think "geomarker methods" for this one should only be about how we use 5072 projection to do a spatial overlay. All of how we created and improved the census tract geography files can go into "geomarker data".

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@cole-brokamp cole-brokamp requested review from cole-brokamp and removed request for cole-brokamp July 17, 2022 21:40
@erikarasnick erikarasnick merged commit 8cd9a35 into master Jul 18, 2022
@erikarasnick erikarasnick deleted the change-col-name branch July 18, 2022 14:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

changing output variable names
2 participants