Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix nvme block resize #352

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 25, 2024
Merged

Fix nvme block resize #352

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 25, 2024

Conversation

AkshaySainiDell
Copy link
Contributor

@AkshaySainiDell AkshaySainiDell commented Oct 25, 2024

Description

Fix nvme block resize.

GitHub Issues

List the GitHub issues impacted by this PR:

GitHub Issue #
dell/csm#1534

Checklist:

  • Have you run format,vet & lint checks against your submission?
  • Have you made sure that the code compiles?
  • Did you run the unit & integration tests successfully?
  • Have you maintained at least 90% code coverage?
  • Have you commented your code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • Have you done corresponding changes to the documentation
  • Did you run tests in a real Kubernetes cluster?
  • Backward compatibility is not broken

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • Tested with PowerMax
    image

@AkshaySainiDell AkshaySainiDell marked this pull request as ready for review October 25, 2024 11:17
Comment on lines +2676 to +2680
nvmeControllerDevice, err := gofsutil.GetNVMeController(deviceName)
if err != nil {
log.Errorf("Failed to rescan device (%s) with error (%s)", deviceName, err.Error())
return nil, status.Error(codes.Internal, err.Error())
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why would the GetNVMeController() call fail? Is bailing out the proper handling? Could anything else be done? The error message is inaccurate and can cause problems during troubleshooting. Is it better to indicate that there was a failure to get the device controller?

log.Errorf("Failed to rescan device (%s) with error (%s)", deviceName, err.Error())
return nil, status.Error(codes.Internal, err.Error())
}
if nvmeControllerDevice != "" {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So there seems to be a place where nvmeControllerDevice can be empty but GetNVMeController() returns no error. Is this code still then correct?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For PowerMax, we have two devices: nvme0c0n1 and nvme0n1.
image

Here, nvme0c0n1 is a controller, but nvme0n1 is not.

The GetNVMeController function processes each device as follows:

  1. nvme0c0n1 - Successfully returns the controller nvme0.
  2. nvme0n1 - print logger Not a valid nvme controller device: nvme0n1 and return empty nvmeControllerDevice

@rishabhatdell rishabhatdell merged commit 822465b into main Oct 25, 2024
5 checks passed
@rishabhatdell rishabhatdell deleted the bugfix-1534-nvme-block-resize branch October 25, 2024 12:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants