Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix for reverse proxy config #837

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 24, 2024
Merged

Conversation

WilsonRadadia20
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR includes updates to the PowerMax reverse proxy configuration file for e2e.

GitHub Issues

List the GitHub issues impacted by this PR:

GitHub Issue #
dell/csm#1594

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code to ensure there are no formatting, vetting, linting, or security issues
  • I have verified that new and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have not allowed coverage numbers to degenerate
  • I have maintained at least 90% code coverage
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have maintained backward compatibility
  • I have executed the relevant end-to-end test scenarios

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • E2E:

For minimal it ran successfully: ./run-e2e-test.sh --minimal --cert-csi=/root/cert-csi --no-modules --pmax
image

For maximal it ran successfully: ./run-e2e-test.sh --cert-csi=/root/cert-csi --no-modules --pmax
image

@suryagupta4 suryagupta4 merged commit f87bb7a into main Dec 24, 2024
7 checks passed
@suryagupta4 suryagupta4 deleted the bug-1594-remove-extra-fields branch December 24, 2024 07:24
WilsonRadadia20 added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 27, 2024
AkshaySainiDell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants