Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

adding v2.6 support for powermax #119

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2023
Merged

adding v2.6 support for powermax #119

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2023

Conversation

boyamurthy
Copy link
Contributor

  1. adding support for k8 1.26
  2. making changes for 2.6.0 config version .

GitHub Issues

List the GitHub issues impacted by this PR:

GitHub Issue #
dell/csm#597
dell/csm#583

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code to ensure there are no formatting, vetting, linting, or security issues
  • I have verified that new and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have not allowed coverage numbers to degenerate
  • I have maintained at least 90% code coverage
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Backward compatibility is not broken

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

unit test
image

installation
image

image

sanity test
image

delldubey
delldubey previously approved these changes Feb 6, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@delldubey delldubey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

delldubey
delldubey previously approved these changes Feb 7, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@rensyct rensyct left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are some checks that are failing, Please take a look at them

@@ -99,8 +134,6 @@ spec:
# Allowed values: map of key-value pairs
# Default value: None
nodeSelector:
# Uncomment if nodes you wish to use have the node-role.kubernetes.io/master taint
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@boyamurthy, we can keep the examples for master in K8s 1.23 samples as they are supported

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated node selector .

@@ -82,8 +117,6 @@ spec:
# Allowed values: map of key-value pairs
# Default value: None
nodeSelector:
# Uncomment if nodes you wish to use have the node-role.kubernetes.io/master taint
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Examples for master under nodeSelector and taints can be kept in 4.10 samples as OCP 4.10 uses K8s 1.23

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated node selector .

@boyamurthy boyamurthy merged commit 62fb94f into main Feb 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants