Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix typos in README.md and documentation #158

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 25, 2024

Conversation

cypherpepe
Copy link
Contributor

@cypherpepe cypherpepe commented Nov 15, 2024

Description

This pull request fixes small typos in the README and documentation files:

  • README.md: Corrected "availbility" to "availability".
  • cryptographic_commitment.html: Fixed "commiments" to "commitments".
  • merkle-trees.html: Changed "ouput" to "output".

These changes improve readability without affecting any functionality.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Corrected typographical errors in the README and cryptographic commitment documents for improved clarity.
    • Removed a paragraph from the Merkle trees documentation that discussed the advantages of using a Merkle tree structure for data verification, streamlining the content.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 15, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request includes textual and formatting corrections across several documentation files. The README.md file has a spelling correction from "availbility" to "availability." In cryptographic_commitment.html, the word "commtiments" is corrected to "commitments," and "Johnanna" is changed to "Johanna." The merkle-trees.html file sees the removal of a paragraph discussing the advantages of Merkle trees. Overall, the changes focus on improving clarity and accuracy without altering the structure or functionality of the documents.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
README.md Corrected "data availbility layer" to "data availability layer."
doc/book/crypto-intro/cryptographic_commitment.html Corrected "commtiments" to "commitments" and "Johnanna" to "Johanna."
doc/book/crypto-intro/merkle-trees.html Removed a paragraph discussing the advantages of using a Merkle tree structure for data verification.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant README
    participant CryptoCommitment
    participant MerkleTrees

    User->>README: Read documentation
    README->>User: Corrected spelling
    User->>CryptoCommitment: Read cryptographic commitment
    CryptoCommitment->>User: Corrected names and terms
    User->>MerkleTrees: Read about Merkle trees
    MerkleTrees->>User: Removed redundant paragraph
Loading

🐇 "In the docs, we found a fix,
A spelling error, quite a mix!
Johanna's name is now just right,
Commitments shine, oh what a sight!
With Merkle trees, we clear the way,
For knowledge bright as a sunny day!" 🌼

Possibly related PRs

  • Fix typos in README.md and documentation #158: The changes in this PR include the same correction of "data availbility layer" to "data availability layer" in the README.md, making it directly related to the main PR. Additionally, it also addresses a typo in the cryptographic_commitment.html file, which is similar in nature to the changes made in the main PR.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
doc/book/crypto-intro/merkle-trees.html (1)

Found typo in navigation menu: "Prerequites" should be "Prerequisites"

The file contains a typo in the navigation menu where "Prerequisites" is misspelled as "Prerequites". This appears to be a legitimate typo that should be fixed according to the PR objectives.

  • Line 90: <li class="part-title">Prerequites</li> should be corrected to <li class="part-title">Prerequisites</li>
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 1-184: No typo fixes found despite PR objectives

The PR objectives mention fixing typos in documentation, but no such corrections are visible in this file. Please verify if any typo fixes were intended for this file.


Let me search for other potential typos in this file to make a comprehensive verification.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for common typos mentioned in PR objectives
# Look for the specific typos mentioned in PR objectives and their corrected versions

echo "Searching for typos mentioned in PR objectives..."
rg -i "availbility|availability|commiments|commitments|ouput|output" doc/book/crypto-intro/merkle-trees.html

Length of output: 3615


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for common misspellings and typos in the file
echo "Searching for potential typos..."
rg -i "prerequites|cryptocurren[cs]y|efficien[ct]|verif[ai]bil[ai]ty|pictoral" doc/book/crypto-intro/merkle-trees.html

Length of output: 2910

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 654286e and b56d625.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • doc/book/crypto-intro/cryptographic_commitment.html (1 hunks)
  • doc/book/crypto-intro/merkle-trees.html (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • README.md
🔇 Additional comments (2)
doc/book/crypto-intro/cryptographic_commitment.html (2)

181-181: LGTM! Clear and accurate explanation.

The paragraph effectively explains cryptographic commitments using a clear analogy and correctly emphasizes the binding and hiding properties.


186-186: LGTM! Name correction properly applied.

The paragraph maintains technical accuracy while incorporating the corrected spelling of "Johanna". The example effectively demonstrates the Merkle tree concept.

@distractedm1nd distractedm1nd merged commit d510473 into deltadevsde:main Nov 25, 2024
1 check passed
This was referenced Dec 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants