Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ETQ Usager, je veux trouver ma commune qui est trop bas dans la liste des résultats #9987

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2024
Merged

ETQ Usager, je veux trouver ma commune qui est trop bas dans la liste des résultats #9987

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2024

Conversation

tchak
Copy link
Member

@tchak tchak commented Feb 13, 2024

No description provided.

@tchak tchak added the bug label Feb 13, 2024
@tchak tchak force-pushed the fix-communes-show-more-results branch from 731a33e to 3230092 Compare February 13, 2024 10:54
@tchak tchak enabled auto-merge February 13, 2024 10:58
@tchak tchak force-pushed the fix-communes-show-more-results branch from 3230092 to ff95a81 Compare February 13, 2024 11:26
@tchak tchak added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 13, 2024
Merged via the queue into demarches-simplifiees:main with commit 447096e Feb 13, 2024
15 checks passed
@tchak tchak deleted the fix-communes-show-more-results branch February 13, 2024 11:48
@sentry-io Sentry.io
Copy link

sentry-io bot commented Feb 22, 2024

Suspect Issues

This pull request was deployed and Sentry observed the following issues:

  • ‼️ Redis::CannotConnectError: Connection refused - connect(2) for 192.168.33.121:6379 (Redis::CannotConnectError) Users::DossiersController#brouillon View Issue

Did you find this useful? React with a 👍 or 👎

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@E-L-T E-L-T E-L-T approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@tchak @E-L-T