Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bugfix/XSUP-23391/IBM-QRadar-v3-time-handling-API19 #27567

Merged

Conversation

efelmandar
Copy link
Contributor

Status

  • In Progress
  • Ready
  • In Hold - (Reason for hold)

Related Issues

fixes: link to the issue

Description

Added a playbook input for the Qradar API version being used (defaults to less than 19) and a check in the playbook to use epoch in seconds or milliseconds

Minimum version of Cortex XSOAR

  • 6.0.0
  • 6.1.0
  • 6.2.0
  • 6.8.0

Does it break backward compatibility?

  • Yes
    • Further details:
  • No

Must have

  • Tests
  • Documentation

@efelmandar efelmandar requested a review from altmannyarden June 19, 2023 12:10
@efelmandar efelmandar marked this pull request as ready for review June 19, 2023 15:12
@efelmandar efelmandar requested a review from altmannyarden June 25, 2023 07:59
@efelmandar efelmandar merged commit c4d5a07 into master Jun 25, 2023
@efelmandar efelmandar deleted the bugfix/XSUP-23391/IBM-QRadar-v3-time-handling-API19 branch June 25, 2023 13:49
MosheEichler pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2023
* Add support for epoch in milliseconds

* Update release notes

* update conversion to epoch milliseconds

* Fix release notes validations

* Update release notes

* Fix review comments

* Update 2_4_24.md
xsoar-bot pushed a commit to xsoar-contrib/content that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2023
* Add support for epoch in milliseconds

* Update release notes

* update conversion to epoch milliseconds

* Fix release notes validations

* Update release notes

* Fix review comments

* Update 2_4_24.md
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants