[WIP] Benefits disability migrate 0781 to lighthouse

[ajones446]

Note: Delete the description statements, complete each step. None are optional, but can be justified as to why they cannot be completed as written. Provide known gaps to testing that may raise the risk of merging to production.

Summary

• This work is behind a feature toggle (flipper): YES/NO
• (Summarize the changes that have been made to the platform)
• (If bug, how to reproduce)
• (What is the solution, why is this the solution?)
• (Which team do you work for, does your team own the maintenance of this component?)
• (If introducing a flipper, what is the success criteria being targeted?)

Related issue(s)

• Link to ticket created in va.gov-team repo OR screenshot of Jira ticket if your team uses Jira
• Link to previous change of the code/bug (if applicable)
• Link to epic if not included in ticket

Testing done

• New code is covered by unit tests
• Describe what the old behavior was prior to the change
• Describe the steps required to verify your changes are working as expected. Exclusively stating 'Specs run' is NOT acceptable as appropriate testing
• If this work is behind a flipper:
  • Tests need to be written for both the flipper on and flipper off scenarios. Docs.
  • What is the testing plan for rolling out the feature?

Screenshots

Note: Optional

What areas of the site does it impact?

(Describe what parts of the site are impacted andifcode touched other areas)

Acceptance criteria

• I fixed|updated|added unit tests and integration tests for each feature (if applicable).
• No error nor warning in the console.
• Events are being sent to the appropriate logging solution
• Documentation has been updated (link to documentation)
• No sensitive information (i.e. PII/credentials/internal URLs/etc.) is captured in logging, hardcoded, or specs
• Feature/bug has a monitor built into Datadog (if applicable)
• If app impacted requires authentication, did you login to a local build and verify all authenticated routes work as expected
• I added a screenshot of the developed feature

Requested Feedback

(OPTIONAL)What should the reviewers know in addition to the above. Is there anything specific you wish the reviewer to assist with. Do you have any concerns with this PR, why?

[github-actions]

1 Warning

⚠️

This PR changes 361 LoC (not counting whitespace/newlines). In order to ensure each PR receives the proper attention it deserves, we recommend not exceeding 200. Expect some delays getting reviews. File Summary Files app/sidekiq/evss/disability_compensation_form/submit_form0781.rb (+22/-9) config/features.yml (+6/-0) lib/disability_compensation/factories/api_provider_factory.rb (+2/-0) lib/disability_compensation/providers/document_upload/lighthouse_supplemental_document_upload_provider.rb (+4/-5) spec/lib/disability_compensation/factories/api_provider_factory_spec.rb (+23/-2) spec/sidekiq/evss/disability_compensation_form/submit_form0781_spec.rb (+286/-2) Note: We exclude files matching the following when considering PR size: *.csv, *.json, *.tsv, *.txt, *.md, Gemfile.lock, app/swagger, modules/mobile/docs, spec/fixtures/, spec/support/vcr_cassettes/, modules/mobile/spec/support/vcr_cassettes/, db/seeds, modules/vaos/app/docs, modules/meb_api/app/docs, modules/appeals_api/app/swagger/, *.bru, *.pdf Big PRs are difficult to review, often become stale, and cause delays.

Generated by 🚫 Danger

[NB28VT]

The ApiProvider takes care of this under the hood but for BDD I left the original code outside of the killswitch toggle which does create an EVSSClaimDocument still

[ajones446]

Ok, thanks! I'll leave it as is.

[NB28VT]

This is just a personal opinion but I'd split the test setup and tests into separate context blocks for 0781 and 0781a to keep this a little more organized

[NB28VT]

This is another one. Yeah I feel like it's such an anti pattern to have the test know all of these internal details/we have to maintain this, but I think it's just a problem with the design of all of the document uploads