-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support Poetry 1.5.1 poetry.lock with absence of category key #7418
Closed
phillipuniverse
wants to merge
6
commits into
dependabot:main
from
phillipuniverse:poetry-1.5-lockfile
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ba0188e
WIP prospecting necessary changes to find dependency category
c91bec8
Find existence of dependency from poetry.lock wthin pyproject.toml
phillipuniverse 8f26071
Update test for dev transitive dependency
phillipuniverse f4b786e
Add tests for a Poetry 1.5-locked lock file and treatment of transiti…
phillipuniverse bfbaece
Add parity to subdependencies in the version resolver
phillipuniverse f8a2e0e
Move wayward comment
phillipuniverse File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just happened to find this function unexpectedly searching around for
subdep_type
. Looks like this logic was always shared with the file updater, but it was small enough such that it made more sense to copy it vs extract into a utility function.Since the logic for determining a "subdep_type" is getting larger, maybe it makes sense to refactor to a separate function? Another set of options:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You forgot to pass
poetry_object
around, and a real update seems to be still failing because of that. So this needs to be fixed before merging, and also signals some lack of coverage here.I'll look into a good place for factoring out this method.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I proposed #7826 to refactor this. We can rebase and adapt this PR to it, and should be all good.