Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency textlint-rule-terminology to v5 #3887

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 2, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented May 1, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
textlint-rule-terminology 4.0.1 -> 5.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

sapegin/textlint-rule-terminology (textlint-rule-terminology)

v5.0.0

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
chore
BREAKING CHANGES
  • Node.js 18 is no longer supported

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge May 1, 2024 07:49
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/textlint-rule-terminology-5.x branch from b9d19b3 to c686fcb Compare May 1, 2024 10:10
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/textlint-rule-terminology-5.x branch from c686fcb to aa478cb Compare May 1, 2024 21:56
@massongit massongit merged commit aa478cb into develop May 2, 2024
35 of 40 checks passed
@massongit massongit deleted the renovate/textlint-rule-terminology-5.x branch May 2, 2024 02:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant