Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Own attribute namespace for os-hardening #114

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 29, 2016
Merged

Own attribute namespace for os-hardening #114

merged 1 commit into from
May 29, 2016

Conversation

joshmyers
Copy link
Contributor

This upstream cookbook looks good, but the attribute name spacing is
less than ideal. This is first attempt to clean this up and make this a
useable cookbook.

See: #88

This upstream cookbook looks good, but the attribute name spacing is
less than ideal. This is first attempt to clean this up and make this a
useable cookbook.

See: #88
@@ -43,8 +43,6 @@ We deprecated `sysctl` version before `0.6.0`. Future versions of this cookbook

## Attributes

* `['desktop']['enable'] = false`
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

any reason why this was removed?

@chris-rock
Copy link
Member

superseeds #88

@chris-rock
Copy link
Member

Great work @joshmyers LGTM, once we fixed the highlighted issues

@chris-rock
Copy link
Member

Highlighted issues are fixed in following PRs.

@chris-rock chris-rock merged commit 106585d into dev-sec:master May 29, 2016
@chris-rock
Copy link
Member

This will be released as part of the 2.0 version of this cookbook

chris-rock added a commit that referenced this pull request May 29, 2016
rollbrettler pushed a commit to rollbrettler/chef-os-hardening that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2016
Use new InSpec integration tests
@artem-sidorenko artem-sidorenko changed the title PP-174 OS hardening Own attribute namespace for os-hardening Apr 6, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants