Registry operator should be in sync with operator SDK releases #1106

kim-tsao · 2023-04-14T16:04:19Z

/kind user-story

Which area this user story is related to?

/area registry

User Story

As a registry operator provider, I want to ensure the operator sdk is kept up to date and in sync with supported k8s and go versions so there is no breakage when running makefile commands.

Acceptance Criteria

When updating k8s and go versions, we need to monitor compatibility with the operator SDK version: https://sdk.operatorframework.io/docs/upgrading-sdk-version/ and perform any migration if necessary
We need to ensure these changes are tested on Openshift and Kubernetes
Ensure README and Release notes are documented with this changes

Target Date: 08-31-2023

kim-tsao · 2023-04-14T16:04:51Z

related to epic: #1007

michael-valdron · 2023-05-19T16:37:26Z

Matching status of #1007

michael-valdron · 2023-07-10T18:00:13Z

related to epic: #1007

Now related to: #410

michael-valdron · 2023-07-18T16:20:56Z

Is there anything further information needed for this issue to be ready for a sprint?

cc: @kim-tsao

michael-valdron · 2023-07-18T17:21:50Z

/area registry

michael-valdron · 2023-07-25T14:50:31Z

Need to start next sprint due to giving focus towards completion of other tasks.

michael-valdron · 2023-07-28T00:29:50Z

Adding all changes needed for go/v3 to go from previous version of the operator sdk v1.22 to the current version v1.26:

michael-valdron · 2023-07-31T16:09:23Z

Migrating from Ginkgo v1 to Ginkgo v2: https://onsi.github.io/ginkgo/MIGRATING_TO_V2

michael-valdron · 2023-07-31T23:42:05Z

Troubleshooting problem:

E0731 23:31:10.200109       1 leaderelection.go:330] error retrieving resource lock registry-operator-system/1984829e.devfile.io: leases.coordination.k8s.io "1984829e.devfile.io" is forbidden: User "system:serviceaccount:registry-operator-system:registry-operator-default" cannot get resource "leases" in API group "coordination.k8s.io" in the namespace "registry-operator-system"
2023-07-31T23:31:11Z    DEBUG   controller-runtime.webhook.webhooks     received request        {"webhook": "/mutate-registry-devfile-io-v1alpha1-devfileregistry", "UID": "cf3aafb5-a4b7-4e10-996b-9cfac32ca8d8", "kind": "registry.devfile.io/v1alpha1, Kind=DevfileRegistry", "resource": {"group":"registry.devfile.io","version":"v1alpha1","resource":"devfileregistries"}}
2023-07-31T23:31:11Z    INFO    devfileregistry-resource        default {"name": "devfile-registry"}
2023-07-31T23:31:11Z    DEBUG   controller-runtime.webhook.webhooks     wrote response  {"webhook": "/mutate-registry-devfile-io-v1alpha1-devfileregistry", "code": 200, "reason": "", "UID": "cf3aafb5-a4b7-4e10-996b-9cfac32ca8d8", "allowed": true}
2023-07-31T23:31:11Z    DEBUG   controller-runtime.webhook.webhooks     received request        {"webhook": "/validate-registry-devfile-io-v1alpha1-devfileregistry", "UID": "e6a73772-32d8-48f7-8515-d4515ea39b3e", "kind": "registry.devfile.io/v1alpha1, Kind=DevfileRegistry", "resource": {"group":"registry.devfile.io","version":"v1alpha1","resource":"devfileregistries"}}
2023-07-31T23:31:11Z    INFO    devfileregistry-resource        validate create {"name": "devfile-registry"}
2023-07-31T23:31:11Z    DEBUG   controller-runtime.webhook.webhooks     wrote response  {"webhook": "/validate-registry-devfile-io-v1alpha1-devfileregistry", "code": 200, "reason": "", "UID": "e6a73772-32d8-48f7-8515-d4515ea39b3e", "allowed": true}

michael-valdron · 2023-08-01T20:36:45Z

Adding all changes needed for go/v3 to go from previous version of the operator sdk v1.22 to the current version v1.26

Current version of the operator sdk actually should be v1.28: https://github.com/devfile/registry-operator/blob/dea070ae240936e290c59e7a1490d836137cbc7d/README.md?plain=1#L30

Adding all go/v3 changes needed for v1.26 to v1.28:

v1.27.0 changes (no changes)
v1.28.0 changes

michael-valdron · 2023-08-03T00:29:22Z

Troubleshooting problem:

E0731 23:31:10.200109       1 leaderelection.go:330] error retrieving resource lock registry-operator-system/1984829e.devfile.io: leases.coordination.k8s.io "1984829e.devfile.io" is forbidden: User "system:serviceaccount:registry-operator-system:registry-operator-default" cannot get resource "leases" in API group "coordination.k8s.io" in the namespace "registry-operator-system"
2023-07-31T23:31:11Z    DEBUG   controller-runtime.webhook.webhooks     received request        {"webhook": "/mutate-registry-devfile-io-v1alpha1-devfileregistry", "UID": "cf3aafb5-a4b7-4e10-996b-9cfac32ca8d8", "kind": "registry.devfile.io/v1alpha1, Kind=DevfileRegistry", "resource": {"group":"registry.devfile.io","version":"v1alpha1","resource":"devfileregistries"}}
2023-07-31T23:31:11Z    INFO    devfileregistry-resource        default {"name": "devfile-registry"}
2023-07-31T23:31:11Z    DEBUG   controller-runtime.webhook.webhooks     wrote response  {"webhook": "/mutate-registry-devfile-io-v1alpha1-devfileregistry", "code": 200, "reason": "", "UID": "cf3aafb5-a4b7-4e10-996b-9cfac32ca8d8", "allowed": true}
2023-07-31T23:31:11Z    DEBUG   controller-runtime.webhook.webhooks     received request        {"webhook": "/validate-registry-devfile-io-v1alpha1-devfileregistry", "UID": "e6a73772-32d8-48f7-8515-d4515ea39b3e", "kind": "registry.devfile.io/v1alpha1, Kind=DevfileRegistry", "resource": {"group":"registry.devfile.io","version":"v1alpha1","resource":"devfileregistries"}}
2023-07-31T23:31:11Z    INFO    devfileregistry-resource        validate create {"name": "devfile-registry"}
2023-07-31T23:31:11Z    DEBUG   controller-runtime.webhook.webhooks     wrote response  {"webhook": "/validate-registry-devfile-io-v1alpha1-devfileregistry", "code": 200, "reason": "", "UID": "e6a73772-32d8-48f7-8515-d4515ea39b3e", "allowed": true}

This was a result of the namePrefix not applying correctly to reference fields. Need to investigate further to decide on a solution going forward, for now the short term fix seems to be assuming this prefix will not be applied to references and manually setting the prefix in with the base name seems to work.

michael-valdron · 2023-08-07T05:22:11Z

Continuing in Sprint 245 due to vacation leave.

thepetk · 2023-08-09T09:51:12Z

Moving item to 245 as requested

michael-valdron · 2023-08-24T04:28:57Z

Troubleshooting problem:

E0731 23:31:10.200109       1 leaderelection.go:330] error retrieving resource lock registry-operator-system/1984829e.devfile.io: leases.coordination.k8s.io "1984829e.devfile.io" is forbidden: User "system:serviceaccount:registry-operator-system:registry-operator-default" cannot get resource "leases" in API group "coordination.k8s.io" in the namespace "registry-operator-system"
2023-07-31T23:31:11Z    DEBUG   controller-runtime.webhook.webhooks     received request        {"webhook": "/mutate-registry-devfile-io-v1alpha1-devfileregistry", "UID": "cf3aafb5-a4b7-4e10-996b-9cfac32ca8d8", "kind": "registry.devfile.io/v1alpha1, Kind=DevfileRegistry", "resource": {"group":"registry.devfile.io","version":"v1alpha1","resource":"devfileregistries"}}
2023-07-31T23:31:11Z    INFO    devfileregistry-resource        default {"name": "devfile-registry"}
2023-07-31T23:31:11Z    DEBUG   controller-runtime.webhook.webhooks     wrote response  {"webhook": "/mutate-registry-devfile-io-v1alpha1-devfileregistry", "code": 200, "reason": "", "UID": "cf3aafb5-a4b7-4e10-996b-9cfac32ca8d8", "allowed": true}
2023-07-31T23:31:11Z    DEBUG   controller-runtime.webhook.webhooks     received request        {"webhook": "/validate-registry-devfile-io-v1alpha1-devfileregistry", "UID": "e6a73772-32d8-48f7-8515-d4515ea39b3e", "kind": "registry.devfile.io/v1alpha1, Kind=DevfileRegistry", "resource": {"group":"registry.devfile.io","version":"v1alpha1","resource":"devfileregistries"}}
2023-07-31T23:31:11Z    INFO    devfileregistry-resource        validate create {"name": "devfile-registry"}
2023-07-31T23:31:11Z    DEBUG   controller-runtime.webhook.webhooks     wrote response  {"webhook": "/validate-registry-devfile-io-v1alpha1-devfileregistry", "code": 200, "reason": "", "UID": "e6a73772-32d8-48f7-8515-d4515ea39b3e", "allowed": true}

This was a result of the namePrefix not applying correctly to reference fields. Need to investigate further to decide on a solution going forward, for now the short term fix seems to be assuming this prefix will not be applied to references and manually setting the prefix in with the base name seems to work.

Continuing to use full account and namespace names under role bindings.

michael-valdron · 2023-08-27T00:28:11Z

Troubleshooting problem:

E0731 23:31:10.200109       1 leaderelection.go:330] error retrieving resource lock registry-operator-system/1984829e.devfile.io: leases.coordination.k8s.io "1984829e.devfile.io" is forbidden: User "system:serviceaccount:registry-operator-system:registry-operator-default" cannot get resource "leases" in API group "coordination.k8s.io" in the namespace "registry-operator-system"
2023-07-31T23:31:11Z    DEBUG   controller-runtime.webhook.webhooks     received request        {"webhook": "/mutate-registry-devfile-io-v1alpha1-devfileregistry", "UID": "cf3aafb5-a4b7-4e10-996b-9cfac32ca8d8", "kind": "registry.devfile.io/v1alpha1, Kind=DevfileRegistry", "resource": {"group":"registry.devfile.io","version":"v1alpha1","resource":"devfileregistries"}}
2023-07-31T23:31:11Z    INFO    devfileregistry-resource        default {"name": "devfile-registry"}
2023-07-31T23:31:11Z    DEBUG   controller-runtime.webhook.webhooks     wrote response  {"webhook": "/mutate-registry-devfile-io-v1alpha1-devfileregistry", "code": 200, "reason": "", "UID": "cf3aafb5-a4b7-4e10-996b-9cfac32ca8d8", "allowed": true}
2023-07-31T23:31:11Z    DEBUG   controller-runtime.webhook.webhooks     received request        {"webhook": "/validate-registry-devfile-io-v1alpha1-devfileregistry", "UID": "e6a73772-32d8-48f7-8515-d4515ea39b3e", "kind": "registry.devfile.io/v1alpha1, Kind=DevfileRegistry", "resource": {"group":"registry.devfile.io","version":"v1alpha1","resource":"devfileregistries"}}
2023-07-31T23:31:11Z    INFO    devfileregistry-resource        validate create {"name": "devfile-registry"}
2023-07-31T23:31:11Z    DEBUG   controller-runtime.webhook.webhooks     wrote response  {"webhook": "/validate-registry-devfile-io-v1alpha1-devfileregistry", "code": 200, "reason": "", "UID": "e6a73772-32d8-48f7-8515-d4515ea39b3e", "allowed": true}

This was a result of the namePrefix not applying correctly to reference fields. Need to investigate further to decide on a solution going forward, for now the short term fix seems to be assuming this prefix will not be applied to references and manually setting the prefix in with the base name seems to work.

Continuing to use full account and namespace names under role bindings.

Resolved these errors by using a different service account name for the operator, previously using the default service account: devfile/registry-operator@5791f81

michael-valdron · 2023-08-28T13:50:02Z

Multi arch build and push rule docker-buildx fixed up, this rule only supports docker: devfile/registry-operator@f73ea53

michael-valdron · 2023-08-28T15:25:38Z

Created CHANGLOG.md to document changes for upcoming releases. Initial changes includes this issue and #881: devfile/registry-operator@6782eab

Issue is ready for review: devfile/registry-operator#45

michael-valdron · 2023-08-28T22:22:15Z

Need to merge openshift/release#42759 before proceeding.

michael-valdron · 2023-08-29T14:56:43Z

Need to merge openshift/release#42759 before proceeding.

openshift/release#42759 has been merged, unblocked.

michael-valdron · 2023-08-29T20:40:32Z

Set back with unexpected integration test errors on the OpenShift CI: https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/devfile_registry-operator/45/pull-ci-devfile-registry-operator-main-v4.12-registry-operator-integration-test/1696556383018684416

michael-valdron · 2023-08-30T15:10:54Z

Set back with unexpected integration test errors on the OpenShift CI: https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/devfile_registry-operator/45/pull-ci-devfile-registry-operator-main-v4.12-registry-operator-integration-test/1696556383018684416

This was resolved setting GOFLAGS="" on all go install commands.

michael-valdron · 2023-08-30T15:32:32Z

Testing is failing possibly due to missed Ginkgo V2 changes for creating a timeout to allow the test devfile registries to deploy.

michael-valdron · 2023-08-30T16:56:51Z

Testing is failing possibly due to missed Ginkgo V2 changes for creating a timeout to allow the test devfile registries to deploy.

This does not seem to be the case, the integration tests seem to fail if the operator is deployed during make test-integration rather than separately by running make install && make deploy beforehand.

Pod registry-operator-controller-manager-75f6b6dcf8-9cpwt created in namespace registry-operator-system...Checking startup data.
Pod started after 25.703438619 seconds
Devfile Registry pod to be ready
I0830 12:31:53.758728  240169 request.go:690] Waited for 1.047570809s due to client-side throttling, not priority and fairness, request: GET:https://api.crc.testing:6443/apis/authorization.openshift.io/v1?timeout=32s
exit status 1
exit status 1
------------------------------
• [FAILED] [2.105 seconds]
[Create Devfile Registry resource with headless enabled] [It] Should deploy a headless devfile registry on to the cluster
/home/mvaldron/source/repos/michael-valdron/devfile-registry-operator/tests/integration/pkg/tests/devfileregistry_tests.go:120

  [FAILED] Failed to create devfileregistry instance: exit status 1
  In [It] at: /home/mvaldron/source/repos/michael-valdron/devfile-registry-operator/tests/integration/pkg/tests/devfileregistry_tests.go:127 @ 08/30/23 12:31:57.032
------------------------------
SSS

Summarizing 1 Failure:
  [FAIL] [Create Devfile Registry resource with headless enabled] [It] Should deploy a headless devfile registry on to the cluster
  /home/mvaldron/source/repos/michael-valdron/devfile-registry-operator/tests/integration/pkg/tests/devfileregistry_tests.go:127

Ran 1 of 4 Specs in 43.097 seconds
FAIL! -- 0 Passed | 1 Failed | 0 Pending | 3 Skipped

feloy · 2023-08-30T18:14:39Z

Testing is failing possibly due to missed Ginkgo V2 changes for creating a timeout to allow the test devfile registries to deploy.

This does not seem to be the case, the integration tests seem to fail if the operator is deployed during make test-integration rather than separately by running make install && make deploy beforehand.

Pod registry-operator-controller-manager-75f6b6dcf8-9cpwt created in namespace registry-operator-system...Checking startup data.
Pod started after 25.703438619 seconds
Devfile Registry pod to be ready
I0830 12:31:53.758728  240169 request.go:690] Waited for 1.047570809s due to client-side throttling, not priority and fairness, request: GET:https://api.crc.testing:6443/apis/authorization.openshift.io/v1?timeout=32s
exit status 1
exit status 1
------------------------------
• [FAILED] [2.105 seconds]
[Create Devfile Registry resource with headless enabled] [It] Should deploy a headless devfile registry on to the cluster
/home/mvaldron/source/repos/michael-valdron/devfile-registry-operator/tests/integration/pkg/tests/devfileregistry_tests.go:120

  [FAILED] Failed to create devfileregistry instance: exit status 1
  In [It] at: /home/mvaldron/source/repos/michael-valdron/devfile-registry-operator/tests/integration/pkg/tests/devfileregistry_tests.go:127 @ 08/30/23 12:31:57.032
------------------------------
SSS

Summarizing 1 Failure:
  [FAIL] [Create Devfile Registry resource with headless enabled] [It] Should deploy a headless devfile registry on to the cluster
  /home/mvaldron/source/repos/michael-valdron/devfile-registry-operator/tests/integration/pkg/tests/devfileregistry_tests.go:127

Ran 1 of 4 Specs in 43.097 seconds
FAIL! -- 0 Passed | 1 Failed | 0 Pending | 3 Skipped

I probably encountered the same problem when testing the operator, working on #46. I have seen that if the operator is not deployed before running make test-integration, the operator is started at the beginning of the tests, but the Pod does not have the time to completely start, and the tests fail due to this.

michael-valdron · 2023-08-30T18:20:14Z

Testing is failing possibly due to missed Ginkgo V2 changes for creating a timeout to allow the test devfile registries to deploy.

This does not seem to be the case, the integration tests seem to fail if the operator is deployed during make test-integration rather than separately by running make install && make deploy beforehand.
Pod registry-operator-controller-manager-75f6b6dcf8-9cpwt created in namespace registry-operator-system...Checking startup data.
Pod started after 25.703438619 seconds
Devfile Registry pod to be ready
I0830 12:31:53.758728  240169 request.go:690] Waited for 1.047570809s due to client-side throttling, not priority and fairness, request: GET:https://api.crc.testing:6443/apis/authorization.openshift.io/v1?timeout=32s
exit status 1
exit status 1
------------------------------
• [FAILED] [2.105 seconds]
[Create Devfile Registry resource with headless enabled] [It] Should deploy a headless devfile registry on to the cluster
/home/mvaldron/source/repos/michael-valdron/devfile-registry-operator/tests/integration/pkg/tests/devfileregistry_tests.go:120

  [FAILED] Failed to create devfileregistry instance: exit status 1
  In [It] at: /home/mvaldron/source/repos/michael-valdron/devfile-registry-operator/tests/integration/pkg/tests/devfileregistry_tests.go:127 @ 08/30/23 12:31:57.032
------------------------------
SSS

Summarizing 1 Failure:
  [FAIL] [Create Devfile Registry resource with headless enabled] [It] Should deploy a headless devfile registry on to the cluster
  /home/mvaldron/source/repos/michael-valdron/devfile-registry-operator/tests/integration/pkg/tests/devfileregistry_tests.go:127

Ran 1 of 4 Specs in 43.097 seconds
FAIL! -- 0 Passed | 1 Failed | 0 Pending | 3 Skipped
I probably encountered the same problem when testing the operator, working on #46. I have seen that if the operator is not deployed before running make test-integration, the operator is started at the beginning of the tests, but the Pod does not have the time to completely start, and the tests fail due to this.

I suspect the same thing, it looks like in the integration test suite we are checking if the pod is running but not if the pod is ready: https://github.com/devfile/registry-operator/blob/9ac99619807eccb75f0cdfff01c189d71c5bd921/tests/integration/pkg/client/pod.go#L66

For this issue I'm trying a short term fix https://github.com/michael-valdron/devfile-registry-operator/blob/2f45c9e2ec83f7444d13203e8d1f068aee12e184/.ci/openshift_integration.sh#L32, but moving forward we should be checking readiness as well. I'll open an issue for this after I have resolved the current issue.

michael-valdron · 2023-08-30T21:11:13Z

openshift-ci is currently failing during setup of the environment: https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/devfile_registry-operator/45/pull-ci-devfile-registry-operator-main-v4.12-registry-operator-integration-test/1696984101262725120

This has pushed the target date for completing this item.

michael-valdron · 2023-08-31T14:55:31Z

openshift-ci is currently failing during setup of the environment: https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/devfile_registry-operator/45/pull-ci-devfile-registry-operator-main-v4.12-registry-operator-integration-test/1696984101262725120

It looks like this has been resolved now: https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/devfile_registry-operator/45/pull-ci-devfile-registry-operator-main-v4.12-registry-operator-integration-test/1697251234546716672

openshift-ci bot added the kind/user-story User story for new enhancement label Apr 14, 2023

johnmcollier added this to Devfile Project Apr 20, 2023

johnmcollier added the needs-triage label Apr 20, 2023

michael-valdron moved this to Need triage in Devfile Project May 19, 2023

michael-valdron mentioned this issue Jul 17, 2023

Put devfile registry operator to OperatorHub #410

Closed

12 tasks

michael-valdron removed the needs-triage label Jul 18, 2023

michael-valdron moved this from Need triage to Backlog in Devfile Project Jul 18, 2023

openshift-ci bot added the area/registry Devfile registry for stacks and infrastructure label Jul 18, 2023

michael-valdron self-assigned this Jul 18, 2023

michael-valdron moved this from Backlog to To Do 📝 in Devfile Project Jul 18, 2023

michael-valdron moved this from To Do 📝 to In Progress 🚧 in Devfile Project Jul 28, 2023

michael-valdron mentioned this issue Aug 1, 2023

Remove deprecated APIs from registry operator #1195

Closed

michael-valdron mentioned this issue Aug 3, 2023

Devfile registry operator pre-release to OperatorHub #1211

Closed

7 tasks

michael-valdron added the severity/blocker Issues that prevent developers from working label Aug 3, 2023

thepetk moved this from In Progress 🚧 to To Do 📝 in Devfile Project Aug 9, 2023

michael-valdron moved this from To Do 📝 to In Progress 🚧 in Devfile Project Aug 23, 2023

michael-valdron mentioned this issue Aug 24, 2023

Updates for operator sdk v1.28 devfile/registry-operator#45

Merged

3 tasks

michael-valdron moved this from In Progress 🚧 to In Review 👀 in Devfile Project Aug 28, 2023

michael-valdron mentioned this issue Aug 28, 2023

Update to golang 1.19 for devfile registry operator openshift/release#42759

Merged

michael-valdron added the status/blocked label Aug 28, 2023

michael-valdron mentioned this issue Aug 28, 2023

Update Ginkgo version in registry operator #881

Closed

2 tasks

michael-valdron removed the status/blocked label Aug 29, 2023

michael-valdron closed this as completed in devfile/registry-operator#45 Aug 31, 2023

michael-valdron moved this from In Review 👀 to Done ✅ in Devfile Project Aug 31, 2023

This was referenced Aug 31, 2023

Add readiness checks to registry operator integration tests #1238

Closed

Update license header files #1004

Closed

michael-valdron mentioned this issue Aug 21, 2024

Upgrade devfile registry operator to use operator SDK v1.36.0 #1626

Open

9 tasks

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Registry operator should be in sync with operator SDK releases #1106

Registry operator should be in sync with operator SDK releases #1106

kim-tsao commented Apr 14, 2023 •

edited by michael-valdron

Loading

kim-tsao commented Apr 14, 2023

michael-valdron commented May 19, 2023

michael-valdron commented Jul 10, 2023

michael-valdron commented Jul 18, 2023

michael-valdron commented Jul 18, 2023

michael-valdron commented Jul 25, 2023

michael-valdron commented Jul 28, 2023

michael-valdron commented Jul 31, 2023

michael-valdron commented Jul 31, 2023

michael-valdron commented Aug 1, 2023

michael-valdron commented Aug 3, 2023

michael-valdron commented Aug 7, 2023

thepetk commented Aug 9, 2023

michael-valdron commented Aug 24, 2023

michael-valdron commented Aug 27, 2023 •

edited

Loading

michael-valdron commented Aug 28, 2023

michael-valdron commented Aug 28, 2023 •

edited

Loading

michael-valdron commented Aug 28, 2023

michael-valdron commented Aug 29, 2023

michael-valdron commented Aug 29, 2023

michael-valdron commented Aug 30, 2023

michael-valdron commented Aug 30, 2023

michael-valdron commented Aug 30, 2023 •

edited

Loading

feloy commented Aug 30, 2023

michael-valdron commented Aug 30, 2023

michael-valdron commented Aug 30, 2023

michael-valdron commented Aug 31, 2023

Registry operator should be in sync with operator SDK releases #1106

Registry operator should be in sync with operator SDK releases #1106

Comments

kim-tsao commented Apr 14, 2023 • edited by michael-valdron Loading

Which area this user story is related to?

User Story

Acceptance Criteria

kim-tsao commented Apr 14, 2023

michael-valdron commented May 19, 2023

michael-valdron commented Jul 10, 2023

michael-valdron commented Jul 18, 2023

michael-valdron commented Jul 18, 2023

michael-valdron commented Jul 25, 2023

michael-valdron commented Jul 28, 2023

michael-valdron commented Jul 31, 2023

michael-valdron commented Jul 31, 2023

michael-valdron commented Aug 1, 2023

michael-valdron commented Aug 3, 2023

michael-valdron commented Aug 7, 2023

thepetk commented Aug 9, 2023

michael-valdron commented Aug 24, 2023

michael-valdron commented Aug 27, 2023 • edited Loading

michael-valdron commented Aug 28, 2023

michael-valdron commented Aug 28, 2023 • edited Loading

michael-valdron commented Aug 28, 2023

michael-valdron commented Aug 29, 2023

michael-valdron commented Aug 29, 2023

michael-valdron commented Aug 30, 2023

michael-valdron commented Aug 30, 2023

michael-valdron commented Aug 30, 2023 • edited Loading

feloy commented Aug 30, 2023

michael-valdron commented Aug 30, 2023

michael-valdron commented Aug 30, 2023

michael-valdron commented Aug 31, 2023

kim-tsao commented Apr 14, 2023 •

edited by michael-valdron

Loading

michael-valdron commented Aug 27, 2023 •

edited

Loading

michael-valdron commented Aug 28, 2023 •

edited

Loading

michael-valdron commented Aug 30, 2023 •

edited

Loading