Fix manufacturer data lost issue (see #267) #357
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Ok, I close and submit again, I found my error.. sorry guys. |
|
If you want to update a PR before it is merged you can just push more commits to the branch you made the PR from, you don't need to close and reopen it. |
I was not aware of it.. anyway, I submit a new one. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is the patch for issue #267 at least for the manufacturer data lost. I have added some
drop()after locks, I not sure about this one, I'm used to release locks as soon as it became unnecessary.ps/ first PR.. please be kind 😏