Skip to content

Conversation

@vincepandolfo
Copy link
Contributor

@vincepandolfo vincepandolfo commented Aug 3, 2016

  • Added methods to initialize spatial data and retrieve results from TimeData objects.
  • Added a test for the save parameter.

A little issue: The final result is at timesteps - 2 while one would expect it to be at timesteps - 1 since the Devito calculated values start from 0.

My guess is that the result when save=False is not the 100th timestep, but the 99th. I can't see why that would happen though.

EDIT: Added issue #69 regarding this problem

@vincepandolfo vincepandolfo force-pushed the test_save branch 2 times, most recently from fe3acf6 to f688c3d Compare August 3, 2016 11:08
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

long line

@FabioLuporini
Copy link
Contributor

if @navjotk is happy with this, I think we can merge

@ggorman ggorman merged commit 09dc155 into master Aug 3, 2016
@ggorman ggorman deleted the test_save branch August 3, 2016 16:38
@vincepandolfo vincepandolfo restored the test_save branch August 4, 2016 10:35
@mlange05 mlange05 deleted the test_save branch August 24, 2016 08:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants