test changelog workflow

[f-leu]

[Title]

📚 Description of Changes

Provide an overview of your changes and why they’re needed. Link to any related issues (e.g., "Fixes #123"). If your PR fixes a bug, resolves a feature request, or updates documentation, please explain how.

• What Changed:
  (Describe the modifications, additions, or removals.)

• Why This Change:
  (Explain the problem this PR addresses or the improvement it provides.)

• Affected Components:
  (Which component does this change affect? - put x for all components)

• Compose

• K8s

• Other (please specify)

❓ Motivation and Context

Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?

• Context:
  (Provide background information or link to related discussions/issues.)

• Relevant Tasks/Issues:
  (e.g., Fixes: #GitHub Issue)

🔍 Types of Changes

Indicate which type of changes your code introduces (check all that apply):

• BUGFIX: Non-breaking fix for an issue.
• NEW FEATURE: Non-breaking addition of functionality.
• BREAKING CHANGE: Fix or feature that causes existing functionality to not work as expected.
• ENHANCEMENT: Improvement to existing functionality.
• CHORE: Changes that do not affect production (e.g., documentation, build tooling, CI).

🔬 QA / Verification Steps

Describe the steps a reviewer should take to verify your changes:

1. (Step one: e.g., "Run make test to verify all tests pass.")
2. (Step two: e.g., "Deploy to a Kind cluster with make create-kind && make deploy.")
3. (Additional steps as needed.)

✅ Global Checklist

Please check all boxes that apply:

• I have read and followed the CONTRIBUTING guidelines.
• My code follows the code style of this project.
• I have updated the documentation as needed.
• I have added tests that cover my changes.
• All new and existing tests have passed locally.
• I have run this code in a local environment to verify functionality.
• I have considered the security implications of this change.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

No user-facing changes in this release. This update includes only internal test files with no impact on functionality or features.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new file testchangelog.txt is introduced containing placeholder changelog text. This is a non-functional addition with no code logic or public API modifications.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Changelog Placeholder testchangelog.txt	New file added with static changelog text content

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Suggested reviewers

• Tzvonimir
• dray92

Poem

🐰 A changelog is born, so small and neat,
Just words on a file, a placeholder treat,
No code to review, no logic to trace,
Just a simple addition to mark this space! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 3

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings, 1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Linked Issues check	⚠️ Warning	The linked issue #123 is about 'cluster snapshot enum name fix', which is unrelated to adding a changelog file; the PR does not address the linked issue requirements.	Either link the correct issue related to the changelog changes, or remove the incorrect issue link. Ensure the PR addresses the objectives of any linked issues.
Out of Scope Changes check	⚠️ Warning	The PR adds a changelog placeholder file, but the linked issue is about cluster snapshot enum fixes; this change appears out of scope relative to the stated issue.	Clarify the scope by linking the correct issue or confirming this changelog file addition is intentional and properly scoped to the work being tracked.
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title 'test changelog workflow' is vague and does not clearly describe the main change; it reads as a placeholder or test title rather than a descriptive summary.	Replace with a more descriptive title that clearly explains the purpose of adding the changelog file, such as 'Add changelog entry placeholder' or 'Initialize changelog file'.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents

In `@README.md`:
- Around line 388-389: Remove the placeholder line "test changelog" from
README.md; locate the exact text "test changelog" in the file and delete it (or
replace it with meaningful documentation/changelog content) so the user-facing
README contains no validation artifacts.