Conversation
- 将"【重要】因各家供应商情况不同，测试结果仅供参考，不代表实际调用效果"调整为第一句 - 将"测试将向供应商发送真实请求，可能消耗少量额度"调整为第二句 - 保持"请确认供应商 URL、API 密钥及模型配置正确"为第三句 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
- 在executeProviderApiTest接口中添加userAgent参数，支持渠道特定的User-Agent配置 - 更新Anthropic Messages API使用claude-cli/2.0.50 (external, cli) User-Agent - 更新OpenAI Chat Completions API使用OpenAI/NodeJS/3.2.1 User-Agent - 更新OpenAI Responses API使用codex_cli_rs/0.63.0 User-Agent - 更新Gemini API使用GeminiCLI/v0.17.1 User-Agent - 移除硬编码的通用User-Agent，改为使用各渠道特定的标识 - 避免被Cloudflare Bot检测系统拦截，提高API测试成功率
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
- 英文版：将"[IMPORTANT] Results may vary by provider..."调整为第一句 - 繁体中文版：将"【重要】因各家供應商情況不同..."调整为第一句 - 保持与简体中文版一致的优先级：结果参考 > 真实请求 > 确认配置 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
…-agents fix: 调整为不同API提供商添加特定User-Agent，避免统一使用claude-cli/2.0.33
将新增/编辑/克隆服务商弹窗宽度从 max-w-4xl (896px) 调整为 max-w-6xl (1152px) 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
根据 PR #208 中的 Critical 评论，修改 React 组件显示顺序而非 JSON 键顺序： • 将 {t("disclaimer.resultReference")} 调整为第一行 • 将 {t("disclaimer.realRequest")} 调整为第二行 • 保持 {t("disclaimer.confirmConfig")} 为第三行 现在免责提醒的实际显示顺序为： 1. 【重要】因各家供应商情况不同，测试结果仅供参考，不代表实际调用效果 2. 测试将向供应商发送真实请求，可能消耗少量额度 3. 请确认供应商 URL、API 密钥及模型配置正确 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
…er-order fix: 调整模型测试提醒顺序
Summary of ChangesHello @ding113, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request refines the application's API testing capabilities by introducing distinct User-Agent headers for various service providers, aiming to enhance the accuracy and success rate of these tests. Concurrently, it improves the user experience by expanding the display area of provider management dialogs and reordering critical disclaimer information for better visibility and understanding. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
ding113
added
enhancement
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a userAgent property to the provider API test functions, allowing each test to use a specific User-Agent string. This is a good improvement to avoid being blocked by services like Cloudflare. The PR also includes some minor UI tweaks, widening dialogs, and updating localization files.
My review focuses on improving the maintainability of the new code by suggesting the use of constants for the new User-Agent strings and standardizing comments to English for better consistency.
🔒 Security Scan Results✅ No security vulnerabilities detected This PR has been scanned against OWASP Top 10, CWE Top 25, and common security anti-patterns. No security issues were identified in the code changes. Changes Analyzed
Security Analysis DetailsUser-Agent String Changes (
Scanned Categories
📋 OWASP Top 10 Coverage
🛡️ Security PostureStrong - This PR makes minimal, low-risk changes. The User-Agent strings are hardcoded constants (not user-controlled), and all existing security controls (session validation, URL validation, authorization checks) remain unchanged. 🤖 Automated security scan by Claude AI - OWASP Top 10 & CWE coverage |
ding113
left a comment
ding113
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📋 Code Review Summary
This PR contains minor UI/UX improvements and a small refactor to make User-Agent configuration more flexible. All changes are low-risk and well-implemented.
🔍 Issues Found
- Critical (🔴): 0 issues
- High (🟠): 0 issues
- Medium (🟡): 0 issues
- Low (🟢): 0 issues
🎯 Priority Actions
No significant issues identified. The PR is ready for merge.
💡 General Observations
Changes reviewed:
- i18n files: Reordered disclaimer messages and added "[IMPORTANT]" prefix for emphasis
- providers.ts: Added channel-specific User-Agent configuration - clean refactor that improves flexibility
- Dialog components: Increased dialog width from 896px to 1152px to prevent horizontal scrolling with long model names
- api-test-button.tsx: Reordered disclaimer display to match i18n key ordering
All changes are straightforward, low-risk, and appropriately scoped.
🤖 Automated review by Claude AI - focused on identifying issues for improvement
2 participants
No description provided.