Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughPR更新了使用文档中的模型配置示例，将两个TOML代码块的模型值从"gpt-5.2-codex"改为"gpt-5.2"，并移除了测试文件中的尾部空行。 Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Cache: Disabled due to Reviews > Disable Cache setting 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Path-based instructions (5)**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx,json}📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
Files:
**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
Files:
src/**/*.{tsx,jsx}📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)
Files:
**/*.{ts,tsx}📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)
Files:
**/*.{tsx,json}📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)
Files:
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (8)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @ding113, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request primarily addresses an issue in the usage documentation where an outdated model name for the Codex provider was causing configuration errors. The change updates the model name in the documentation examples to ensure they are correct and functional. Additionally, a small formatting adjustment was made in a test file to align with code style guidelines. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request delivers two targeted fixes. The primary change updates the Codex model name in the usage documentation from gpt-5.2-codex to gpt-5.2. As noted in the description, this is a necessary correction to prevent errors when using a high reasoning effort, thereby improving the accuracy and usability of the documentation. The second change is a minor formatting adjustment in a test file to resolve a linting issue. Both changes are correct and improve the project's quality. The pull request is well-scoped and ready for merging.
🧪 测试结果
总体结果: ✅ 所有测试通过 |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review Summary
No significant issues identified in this PR.
PR Size: XS
- Lines changed: 5
- Files changed: 2
Review Coverage
- Logic and correctness - Clean
- Security (OWASP Top 10) - Clean
- Error handling - Clean
- Type safety - Clean
- Documentation accuracy - Clean
- Test coverage - Adequate
- Code clarity - Good
Automated review by Codex AI
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- Identified and reviewed PR
#545(docs: fix Codex model config in usage-doc). - Applied PR size label:
size/XS(5 lines changed, 2 files). - No diff-line issues met the >=80 confidence reporting threshold, so no inline comments were posted.
- Submitted the “No significant issues” review summary via
gh pr review.
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from Backlog
to Done
in Claude Code Hub Roadmap
1 participant
Fix the Codex provider config examples in usage-doc:
This avoids 400 invalid_request_error caused by unsupported reasoning effort when using gpt-5.2-codex.
Also includes a tiny Biome formatting fix in one unit test file (trailing blank line) to keep lint green.
Closes #542
Greptile Summary
Fixes incorrect Codex model configuration in usage documentation by changing
model = "gpt-5.2-codex"tomodel = "gpt-5.2"in two configuration examples. This prevents 400 invalid_request_error when usingmodel_reasoning_effort = "xhigh"with the Codex model, asgpt-5.2-codexonly supportsreasoning_effort = "medium". Also includes a minor Biome formatting fix (removed trailing blank line) in a test file.Key Changes:
model_reasoning_effort = "xhigh"intact as it works correctly withgpt-5.2This documentation fix complements the error rule added in #544 that handles this specific error scenario.
Confidence Score: 5/5
Important Files Changed
Sequence Diagram
sequenceDiagram participant User participant UsageDoc as Usage Doc Page participant CodeBlock as Code Block Component participant UserConfig as User's config.toml Note over User,UserConfig: Before Fix: Incorrect Configuration User->>UsageDoc: View Codex configuration examples UsageDoc->>CodeBlock: Display model = "gpt-5.2-codex"<br/>with model_reasoning_effort = "xhigh" User->>UserConfig: Copy configuration UserConfig-->>User: 400 invalid_request_error:<br/>Unsupported reasoning effort Note over User,UserConfig: After Fix: Correct Configuration User->>UsageDoc: View Codex configuration examples UsageDoc->>CodeBlock: Display model = "gpt-5.2"<br/>with model_reasoning_effort = "xhigh" User->>UserConfig: Copy corrected configuration UserConfig-->>User: ✓ Configuration works correctly