Fix shape equality in ADT validator #1514
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It was causing false negatives (
doesMemberTargetAdtShape
being false when it should betrue
) for some shapes, when a lot of shapes were added in an unrelated namespace.Some
ShapeId
constructors use a cache internally, which explains why it'd sometimes still match instance equality, but it's not a mechanism that should be relied upon, and it will never be one.I've also checked for any other usages of
==
in our Java sources and they are all about primitives/enums, so it's fine.Not adding tests due to the unpredictable nature of the issue.
PR Checklist (not all items are relevant to all PRs)