Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dispatch.test package #86

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Feb 22, 2024
Merged

dispatch.test package #86

merged 11 commits into from
Feb 22, 2024

Conversation

chriso
Copy link
Contributor

@chriso chriso commented Feb 22, 2024

It's difficult for users to test their Dispatch endpoint. To dispatch calls to functions, users must connect to the production Dispatch orchestrator, and also jump through hoops to expose their local endpoint on the internet (e.g. using ngrok) so that Dispatch can access it.

This PR improves and exports the internal classes we were using to test the SDK. The new dispatch.test package contains a fully functional (albeit very simple) local Dispatch service that can be used in place of the production Dispatch orchestrator. This allows users to play around with the basic functionality of Dispatch, and unit/integration test their functions/graphs, all without requiring an internet connection.

The provided Dispatch service does the absolute bare minimum to drive a graph of execution to completion. Internally, it uses a simple FIFO queue. There are no limits and no adaptive concurrency control.

Copy link
Contributor

@achille-roussel achille-roussel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a great first step 👍

Let's go with it, I'll run a couple experiments we talked about on the API to see if there are options that would simplify things a bit futher.

@chriso chriso merged commit 0a4391d into main Feb 22, 2024
3 checks passed
@chriso chriso deleted the test-server branch February 22, 2024 23:54
@chriso chriso self-assigned this Feb 23, 2024
@chriso chriso mentioned this pull request Feb 23, 2024
@chriso chriso mentioned this pull request Mar 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants