Refactoring validation to json-schema #14
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…e with json-schema for now (data consistency)
…(GET /users?filter[location]=lat0,lon0,lat1,lon1)
mrkvon
changed the title
mrkvon
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The json-schema validation is generalized into a function returning an express middleware.
Refactoring
POST /users/:username/tagsandPATCH /users/:username/tags/:tagname.TODO: The JSON API contains some duplicate data (id of a document in url and in body (i.e. usernames, tagnames, etc.)). We need to compare them to validate. Json-schema is weak/unable to do this. ajv library might be able to do it, or we do it independently.
There is also a proposition to include this ability to json-schema.