general: pass self to ./lib & ./hosts

[blaggacao]

It is generally useful to acess the top level flake from
library functions or hosts. This not only simplifies
the mental model and code but also provides additional
context and not least a handle to the repo source code
in the nix store.

closes #169

bors delegate=@Pacman99

[blaggacao]

bors r+

[bors]

🔒 Permission denied

Existing reviewers: click here to make blaggacao a reviewer

[blaggacao]

bors try

[blaggacao]

@Pacman99 Is this clarifying force push correct?

https://github.com/divnix/devos/compare/0173d29843c5f272a11bbec9ea56f938f759471c..30f18c720e917f71caf12e78084b0ab7c3a09707

[Pacman99]

Yeah this makes sense, it would be good to get in these changes soon.

[Pacman99]

I think @nrdxp has to delegate one of us first since they're the repo owner.

[blaggacao]

bors r+

[bors]

🔒 Permission denied

Existing reviewers: click here to make blaggacao a reviewer

[bors]

try

Timed out.

[nrdxp]

Is this a duplicate of #164?

[blaggacao]

It is a carve out as direct dependency to #168 and is included in #168 .

I wanted to separate concerns of #164 in order to accentuate and walk through their use cases a little slower.

[Pacman99]

I would prefer we discuss and merge #164 instead since thats already come up as a requirement for a couple other PR's. I don't see the point in picking apart the different parts of it into seperate PR's that need it.

[nrdxp]

I think @nrdxp has to delegate one of us first since they're the repo owner.

That is correct, delegation happens on a per PR basis. I did give you both access to run bors try though.

[blaggacao]

I don't see the point in picking apart the different parts of it into seperate PR's that need it.

It's kind of a review tactic of mine... 😉 Also, #164 had a lot of force pushes which made it hard in my opinion to follow the complete thought process.

This was a dependency of #168 so it was just incorporated.