Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump esbuild from 0.20.1 to 0.20.2 #716

Merged

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Mar 18, 2024

Bumps esbuild from 0.20.1 to 0.20.2.

Release notes

Sourced from esbuild's releases.

v0.20.2

  • Support TypeScript experimental decorators on abstract class fields (#3684)

    With this release, you can now use TypeScript experimental decorators on abstract class fields. This was silently compiled incorrectly in esbuild 0.19.7 and below, and was an error from esbuild 0.19.8 to esbuild 0.20.1. Code such as the following should now work correctly:

    // Original code
    const log = (x: any, y: string) => console.log(y)
    abstract class Foo { @log abstract foo: string }
    new class extends Foo { foo = '' }
    // Old output (with --loader=ts --tsconfig-raw={"compilerOptions":{"experimentalDecorators":true}})
    const log = (x, y) => console.log(y);
    class Foo {
    }
    new class extends Foo {
    foo = "";
    }();
    // New output (with --loader=ts --tsconfig-raw={"compilerOptions":{"experimentalDecorators":true}})
    const log = (x, y) => console.log(y);
    class Foo {
    }
    __decorateClass([
    log
    ], Foo.prototype, "foo", 2);
    new class extends Foo {
    foo = "";
    }();

  • JSON loader now preserves __proto__ properties (#3700)

    Copying JSON source code into a JavaScript file will change its meaning if a JSON object contains the __proto__ key. A literal __proto__ property in a JavaScript object literal sets the prototype of the object instead of adding a property named __proto__, while a literal __proto__ property in a JSON object literal just adds a property named __proto__. With this release, esbuild will now work around this problem by converting JSON to JavaScript with a computed property key in this case:

    // Original code
    import data from 'data:application/json,{"__proto__":{"fail":true}}'
    if (Object.getPrototypeOf(data)?.fail) throw 'fail'
    // Old output (with --bundle)
    (() => {
    // <data:application/json,{"proto":{"fail":true}}>
    var json_proto_fail_true_default = { proto: { fail: true } };
    // entry.js
    if (Object.getPrototypeOf(json_proto_fail_true_default)?.fail)
    throw "fail";
    })();

... (truncated)

Changelog

Sourced from esbuild's changelog.

0.20.2

  • Support TypeScript experimental decorators on abstract class fields (#3684)

    With this release, you can now use TypeScript experimental decorators on abstract class fields. This was silently compiled incorrectly in esbuild 0.19.7 and below, and was an error from esbuild 0.19.8 to esbuild 0.20.1. Code such as the following should now work correctly:

    // Original code
    const log = (x: any, y: string) => console.log(y)
    abstract class Foo { @log abstract foo: string }
    new class extends Foo { foo = '' }
    // Old output (with --loader=ts --tsconfig-raw={&quot;compilerOptions&quot;:{&quot;experimentalDecorators&quot;:true}})
    const log = (x, y) => console.log(y);
    class Foo {
    }
    new class extends Foo {
    foo = "";
    }();
    // New output (with --loader=ts --tsconfig-raw={&quot;compilerOptions&quot;:{&quot;experimentalDecorators&quot;:true}})
    const log = (x, y) => console.log(y);
    class Foo {
    }
    __decorateClass([
    log
    ], Foo.prototype, "foo", 2);
    new class extends Foo {
    foo = "";
    }();

  • JSON loader now preserves __proto__ properties (#3700)

    Copying JSON source code into a JavaScript file will change its meaning if a JSON object contains the __proto__ key. A literal __proto__ property in a JavaScript object literal sets the prototype of the object instead of adding a property named __proto__, while a literal __proto__ property in a JSON object literal just adds a property named __proto__. With this release, esbuild will now work around this problem by converting JSON to JavaScript with a computed property key in this case:

    // Original code
    import data from 'data:application/json,{"__proto__":{"fail":true}}'
    if (Object.getPrototypeOf(data)?.fail) throw 'fail'
    // Old output (with --bundle)
    (() => {
    // <data:application/json,{"proto":{"fail":true}}>
    var json_proto_fail_true_default = { proto: { fail: true } };
    // entry.js
    if (Object.getPrototypeOf(json_proto_fail_true_default)?.fail)
    throw "fail";
    })();

... (truncated)

Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [esbuild](https://github.com/evanw/esbuild) from 0.20.1 to 0.20.2.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](evanw/esbuild@v0.20.1...v0.20.2)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: esbuild
  dependency-type: direct:development
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot bot requested a review from jbr as a code owner March 18, 2024 17:16
@dependabot dependabot bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file javascript Pull requests that update Javascript code labels Mar 18, 2024
@dependabot dependabot bot requested a review from a team as a code owner March 18, 2024 17:16
Copy link
Contributor

@divviup-github-automation divviup-github-automation left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Auto-approving dependabot PR.

@divviup-github-automation divviup-github-automation enabled auto-merge (squash) March 18, 2024 17:17
@divviup-github-automation divviup-github-automation merged commit f13e205 into main Mar 18, 2024
5 checks passed
@divviup-github-automation divviup-github-automation deleted the dependabot/npm_and_yarn/esbuild-0.20.2 branch March 18, 2024 17:19
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 8330850945

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 84.871%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 8237309908: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 3451
Relevant Lines: 4079

💛 - Coveralls

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file javascript Pull requests that update Javascript code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants