Reduced references to #django IRC.

[sarahboyce]

Following https://forum.djangoproject.com/t/proposal-retire-irc/37129 and https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/35999, these are my suggested updates for the website.

I have chosen to:

• keep IRC on the community More Help section
• replace references of IRC in the code of conduct sections with the forum. These are still valid and we could leave IRC, however, I think the forum or Discord would be a more common case. moved to Removed IRC from example Django spaces for CoC violations. #1823

[sarahboyce]

See also django/code.djangoproject.com#244

[bmispelon]

This is looking great, thanks! ✨

Could you split the CoC changes to their own PR? Out of an abundance of caution I'd like to get those changes reviewed by the CoC workgroup (that's the documented process for changes there I believe).

[bmispelon]

I wonder if this these changes could be made part of #1808 , that would made the review easier probably.

[sarahboyce]

Could you split the CoC changes to their own PR? Out of an abundance of caution I'd like to get those changes reviewed by the CoC workgroup (that's the documented process for changes there I believe).

Done #1823

I wonder if this these changes could be made part of #1808 , that would made the review easier probably.

I see, looks like that PR is coc changes only (similar to the new PR #1823) I agree that new PR can be combined with that one to give the CoC team one review. The idea being that the "Django spaces" have been updated to give more common examples.
@ontowhee would you like to do that or shall I?

[ontowhee]

@sarahboyce I can merge #1823 into #1808.

[sarahboyce]

@sarahboyce I can merge #1823 into #1808.

Thank you - I will close the PR 👍