Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Polish for fixes from #223 and #224 #226

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Oct 17, 2024
Merged

Polish for fixes from #223 and #224 #226

merged 9 commits into from
Oct 17, 2024

Conversation

djc
Copy link
Owner

@djc djc commented Oct 17, 2024

@tneely thanks for your efforts so far! I have some nits to pick with your PRs but figured it might be more expedient (especially given the ~24-hour RTT) if I just took care of them myself. Will retain your authorship and make minor changes.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 17, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 93.54839% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 81.50%. Comparing base (6204b0d) to head (6a8ad30).
Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
bb8/src/internals.rs 93.47% 3 Missing ⚠️
bb8/src/inner.rs 93.75% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #226      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.03%   81.50%   +1.47%     
==========================================
  Files           6        6              
  Lines         621      665      +44     
==========================================
+ Hits          497      542      +45     
+ Misses        124      123       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

djc and others added 9 commits October 17, 2024 11:57
The reaper only runs against the connections in its idle pool. This is
fine for reaping idle connections, but for hotly contested connections
beyond their maximum lifetime this can prove problematic.

Consider an active connection beyond its lifetime and a reaper that runs
every 3 seconds:
- [t0] Connection is idle
- [t1] Connection is active
- [t2] Reaper runs, does not see connection
- [t3] Connection is idle

This pattern can repeat infinitely with the connection never being reaped.

By checking the max lifetime on drop, we can ensure that expired
connections are reaped in a reason amount of time (assuming they
eventually do get dropped).
It's possible to trigger more approvals than are necessary, in turn
grabbing more connections than we need. This happens when we drop a
connection. The drop produces a notify, which doesn't get used until the
pool is empty. The first `Pool::get()` call on an empty pool will spawn
an connect task, immediately complete `notify.notified().await`, then
spawn a second connect task. Both will connect and we'll end up with 1
more connection than we need.

Rather than address the notify issue directly, this fix introduces some
bookkeeping that tracks the number of open `pool.get()` requests we have
waiting on connections. If the number of pending connections >= the
number of pending gets, we will not spawn any additional connect tasks.
@@ -252,6 +252,11 @@ impl<C: Send> Conn<C> {
birth: Instant::now(),
}
}

pub(crate) fn is_expired(&self, now: Instant, max: Duration) -> bool {
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Interestingly, your earlier formulation of this failed on Windows due to an overflow. You changed now - conn.conn.birth >= lifetime to (effectively) self.birth <= (now - lifetime), but this failed CI on Windows with overflow when subtracting duration from instant on line 155 (which did the now - lifetime substraction). Changed this to still extract the method, but take 2 arguments so we can keep the earlier formulation.

@djc djc merged commit 329519c into main Oct 17, 2024
10 checks passed
@djc
Copy link
Owner Author

djc commented Oct 17, 2024

  • Published bb8 v0.8.6 at registry crates-io
  • [new tag] v0.8.6 -> v0.8.6
  • Release notes

(Don't know if AWS does any sponsoring of OSS projects, but would sure be nice to get some compensation for ongoing maintenance of this crate.)

@tneely
Copy link
Contributor

tneely commented Oct 21, 2024

Thanks for getting this over the finish line!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants