Don't copy all of redis into memory #5
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 2 commits
May 14, 2014 13:43
This set of changes makes us keep the sums for each category in their own key, and then when we need to get the scores for a number of tokens, we fetch only those tokens plus that sum. The fetching of words is done via redis pipelining for speed.
* Adjust other specs to account for new ':total' keys
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This set of changes makes us keep the sums for each category
in their own redis key, and then when we need to get the scores for
a number of tokens, we fetch only those tokens plus that sum.
The :total key is created on the fly, so that existing Linnaeus redis stores can be upgraded.
For me, my spam filter application went from 0.35 to 0.008 seconds to check a message. A pretty big difference. Scaling will also improve with large and growing databases.