This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 26, 2024. It is now read-only.
double forking for process spawning #211
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I really don't like double-forking. It leaves orphaned processes and messes up the process tree. Is the XWayland implementation forcing our hand on this one? |
Yes, try wlroots-next, Xwayland won't be able to spawn |
We could do something like this to avoid orphaned processes |
|
Well, I'm still bummed we can't just SIG_IGN the whole thing because of the XWayland fork/wait, but I put together an idea over in #212 which seems to work (and as a bonus, is shorter 😁). |
|
Closed in favor of #212 |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes: #177