Closed
Conversation
Member
|
@wilzbach where is the GSoC plan? 👿 |
Contributor
|
Why? Travis is not for testing Phobos. We have the auto tester for that. |
Contributor
Author
Jobs are run parallel at Travis and the idea of adding the 32-bit job is that we go through all 32-bits paths at least once and don't have misleading coverage reports.
The main reason for Travis is that it's a lot easier to modify - if you want to integrate coverage statistic with AutoTester (e.g. with codecov-bash) that would be very nice too :) |
Current coverage is 88.71% (diff: 100%)@@ master #4699 diff @@
==========================================
Files 121 122 +1
Lines 73916 74163 +247
Methods 0 0
Messages 0 0
Branches 0 0
==========================================
+ Hits 65566 65793 +227
- Misses 8350 8370 +20
Partials 0 0
|
Contributor
Author
|
Superseded by #4719 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
in reference to #4639