std.uni: Replace parameter storage class in by what it should express… #6074
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
… (const scope, but dmd treats it as const); see also merged dlang.org PR #2126 or issue #17928
This is a trivial, 'basic' PR in a coming series of PRs dedicated to make std.uni compilable with -dip1000.
Until yesterday's merge of dlang/dlang.org#2126, there was the confusing situatiom, that parameter storage class 'in' was documented in spec as being an equivalent of 'const scope', though dmd treats 'in' as an equivalent of 'const' currently.
Likely, the code author wanted to/should express 'const scope' by using 'in', thus this PR is just a blunt copy-and-paste to sort out the bulk of (-dip1000) compiler errors.
Anyway, I'll check for scope required or not in another pass.