Fix Issue 24823 - std.json: Allow optionally preserving the order of fields in JSON objects #9064
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is the same goal as #6059 , but a more minimal / conservative approach - instead of adding a policy framework, this is behind a new
JSONOptions
flag.In theory this is perfectly backwards compatible, as pre-existing D code will never cause any
orderedObject
to be created. TheorderedObject
type is entirely opt-in, whether viaJSONOptions.preserveObjectOrder
, or created manually by starting from aJSONValue.emptyOrderedObject
or the.orderedObject
setter.The only gotcha might be any possible
final switch
-es overJSONType
, let's see what BuildKite says - if this is an issue thenJSONType.orderedObject
could be moved to abool
instead.