Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Roadmap: feature requests #3439

Open
17 of 32 tasks
hcho3 opened this issue Jul 4, 2018 · 5 comments
Open
17 of 32 tasks

Roadmap: feature requests #3439

hcho3 opened this issue Jul 4, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@hcho3
Copy link
Collaborator

hcho3 commented Jul 4, 2018

This issue is aimed at keeping track of requested features.

Note to developers and contributors: If you plan to actively work to implement a requested feature, re-open the linked issue. Everyone is welcome to work on any of the issues below. For specifics, read the linked issues.

Note to maintainers: All issues with feature requests should be consolidated to this document. Close all new issues with feature requests and create corresponding new entries in the following checklist. (Don't forget to create a link to the closed issue.) This is so that the number of open issues is kept manageable. Also make sure to attach feature-request label when closing feature requests

Distributed learning

Python specific

JVM specific

Documentation

@hcho3
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hcho3 commented Jul 20, 2018

Single instance prediction was added to JVM package by #3464.

@thvasilo
Copy link
Contributor

thvasilo commented Oct 3, 2018

Hello @hcho3 in the forum the ability to define the probability of each feature being selected when col_sample is being used has been requested a few times recently [1].

If we want to add this as a feature request I could create an issue to track it, and take it up since it doesn't seem too complicated once we agree on a design.

[1] https://discuss.xgboost.ai/t/sampsize-by-strata-in-subsample/281

@hcho3
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hcho3 commented Oct 4, 2018

@thvasilo That would be great. Thanks!

@thvasilo
Copy link
Contributor

thvasilo commented Oct 4, 2018

Opened #3754 to track this.

@loretoparisi
Copy link

+1 for Multiple output regression

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants