-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 754
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Re-install module with skin causes install failure #3536
Comments
We are talking about a repair install like all the packages have the same version? Or is this a new version and if so did all the packages version had their versions bumped? |
It's only on repair installs. If you remove the "Skin" from the DNN manifesto, the repair works OK. |
My Statement before was wring. This is for ANY install repair or now. If the skin is already there DNN will NOT install the module. |
We have detected this issue has not had any activity during the last 90 days. That could mean this issue is no longer relevant and/or nobody has found the necessary time to address the issue. We are trying to keep the list of open issues limited to those issues that are relevant to the majority and to close the ones that have become 'stale' (inactive). If no further activity is detected within the next 14 days, the issue will be closed automatically. |
This is still active AFIK. I have had to create 2 install packages, to overcome the problem. |
We have detected this issue has not had any activity during the last 90 days. That could mean this issue is no longer relevant and/or nobody has found the necessary time to address the issue. We are trying to keep the list of open issues limited to those issues that are relevant to the majority and to close the ones that have become 'stale' (inactive). If no further activity is detected within the next 14 days, the issue will be closed automatically. |
This is still active AFIK. I have had to create 2 install packages, to overcome the problem. |
We have detected this issue has not had any activity during the last 90 days. That could mean this issue is no longer relevant and/or nobody has found the necessary time to address the issue. We are trying to keep the list of open issues limited to those issues that are relevant to the majority and to close the ones that have become 'stale' (inactive). If no further activity is detected within the next 14 days, the issue will be closed automatically. |
This is still active AFIK. I have had to create 2 install packages, to overcome the problem. |
We have detected this issue has not had any activity during the last 90 days. That could mean this issue is no longer relevant and/or nobody has found the necessary time to address the issue. We are trying to keep the list of open issues limited to those issues that are relevant to the majority and to close the ones that have become 'stale' (inactive). If no further activity is detected within the next 14 days, the issue will be closed automatically. |
Still active. but I doubt it will ever be fixed. Maybe it should be closed to concentrate of more important things. |
Well, the purpose of stalebot is to close issues that have no progress due to nobody caring hard enough to even keep the conversation rolling. But every time someone comments "still and issue" or similar without anything to help the issue get some possible code contribution, well it's just stale longer :) I gonna close it but if anyone has the intention to work on this, just comment and I'll reopen. |
#3319 Description of bug
Re-installing a module that installs a skin fails, with an error message the skin already exists,
Steps to reproduce
Current behavior
Expected behavior
Both installs should work.
Error information
Not got it.. but Fails with duplicate name or something like that.
Affected version
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: