Support for ruby:3.0-bookworm

[samruddhikhandale]

From #397 (comment) & #392

In Alpine 3.17, Openssl is 3 by default, so those images are already using it (and the reason for 2.7 and 3.0 not having Alpine 3.17 images). See #392.

Alpine 3.17 ships with openssl3 by default. Ruby 2.7 and 3.0 only build with openssl1, but there is a compat package which can be installed. I'm assuming that this will also be a problem for future debian versions.

I understand that this (☝️) is the same reason for not having a release of ruby:3.0-bookworm.

My question, are there any plans of supporting ruby:3.0-bookworm? (by probably adding the compatibility package as mentioned above)

[tianon]

I don't think Debian has an OpenSSL 1.1 compatibility package for Bookworm.

[samruddhikhandale]

I see, @tianon does that mean there would NOT be an images release for ruby:3.0-bookworm?
Also, would it be the same case for php:8.0-apache-bookworm? (Ref)

[tianon]

Correct - Ruby 3.0 has no plans to support OpenSSL 3, is already in "security maintenance" mode, and will be EOL shortly into next year (https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/downloads/branches/; 2024-03-31).

The same applies to PHP 8.0, although with an even tighter timeline (https://www.php.net/supported-versions.php; 26 Nov 2023).