remove uses of pkg/errors in tests #5781
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
While there may be reasons to keep pkg/errors in production code, we don't need them for these tests. Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
While there may be reasons to keep pkg/errors in production code, we don't need them for these tests. Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
thaJeztah
added
status/2-code-review
area/testing
kind/refactor
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
❌ Your patch status has failed because the patch coverage (0.00%) is below the target coverage (50.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5781 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 59.42% 59.42%
=======================================
Files 347 347
Lines 29402 29402
=======================================
Hits 17472 17472
Misses 10958 10958
Partials 972 972 |
While there may be reasons to keep pkg/errors in production code, we don't need them for these tests. Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
While there may be reasons to keep pkg/errors in production code, we don't need them for these tests. Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
While there may be reasons to keep pkg/errors in production code, we don't need them for these tests. Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
While there may be reasons to keep pkg/errors in production code, we don't need them for these tests. Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
While there may be reasons to keep pkg/errors in production code, we don't need them for these tests. Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
While there may be reasons to keep pkg/errors in production code, we don't need them for these tests. Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
While there may be reasons to keep pkg/errors in production code, we don't need them for these tests. Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
While there may be reasons to keep pkg/errors in production code, we don't need them for these tests. Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
While there may be reasons to keep pkg/errors in production code, we don't need them for these tests. Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
While there may be reasons to keep pkg/errors in production code, we don't need them for these tests. Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
While there may be reasons to keep pkg/errors in production code, we don't need them for these tests. Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
While there may be reasons to keep pkg/errors in production code, we don't need them for these tests. Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
While there may be reasons to keep pkg/errors in production code, we don't need them for these tests. Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
While there may be reasons to keep pkg/errors in production code, we don't need them for these tests. Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
While there may be reasons to keep pkg/errors in production code, we don't need them for these tests. Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
thaJeztah
force-pushed
the
less_pkg_errors
branch
from
bb068e2 to
c55b39a
Compare
|
Flaky test? |
While there may be reasons to keep pkg/errors in production code, we don't need them for these tests. Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
While there may be reasons to keep pkg/errors in production code, we don't need them for these tests. Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
haven't seen this one fail before 🤔 |
Benehiko
approved these changes
Feb 3, 2025
Yeah, not sure either; but for those, I usually start with putting a comment on the PR; if we see it fail again, that can help find back "did it fail before?" to see if it's flaky. |
|
Let me bring this one in; I may have some other things stashed locally 😂 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
relates to:
- Description for the changelog
- A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)