Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update check ID and add check groups for CIS Controls v8 (v1.6.0 - 06-14-2023) #546

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 20, 2023
Merged

Update check ID and add check groups for CIS Controls v8 (v1.6.0 - 06-14-2023) #546

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 20, 2023

Conversation

martipoe
Copy link

@martipoe martipoe commented Dec 17, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Changes:

  • In the CIS Benchmark v1.6.0 from 06-14-2023, the check "Ensure swarm mode is not Enabled, if not needed" is listed in chapter "5 Container Runtime Configuration" with ID 5.1 (previously 7.1).
  • Added check groups for CIS Controls v8 IG1-3 mapped recommendations

@martipoe martipoe changed the title feat: update swarm mode check id from 7.1 to 5.1 v1.6.0 - 06-14-2023: Update check ID and add check groups for CIS Controls v8 Dec 17, 2023
@martipoe martipoe changed the title v1.6.0 - 06-14-2023: Update check ID and add check groups for CIS Controls v8 Update check ID and add check groups for CIS Controls v8 (v1.6.0 - 06-14-2023) Dec 17, 2023
@konstruktoid
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks @martipoe! I've been holding out on these changes since I reported the 7.1 move as an bug 2 months ago (https://workbench.cisecurity.org/tickets/19871), but without any reply your PR seems totally fine.

@konstruktoid konstruktoid merged commit ba0b402 into docker:master Dec 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@konstruktoid konstruktoid konstruktoid approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@martipoe @konstruktoid