-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
It should note that bridge interface may need to be added to a firewall zone with firewalld #11691
Comments
yes please!!! pulling my hair out for >1 hour now because of this !!! |
oh, btw - adding that interfaces manually via firewall-cmd is a workaround - not a solution. the solution is, to integrate docker with firewalld on centos8. i'm curious how centos8 is mentioned for usage when integration apparently is incomplete. https://docs.docker.com/engine/install/centos/#prerequisites there should at least exist a hint with some warning that br-${docker_network_id} don't get added to appropriate firewalld zone and thus, outgoing conections from inside docker containers won't work |
There hasn't been any activity on this issue for a long time. Prevent issues from auto-closing with a /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
This is happening to me after upgrading to docker How to reproduce:
|
File: network/network-tutorial-standalone.md
This article should include warning that in some environments (e.g. firewalld on clean-install CentOS 8) user-defined bridge interface (which may be done via docker-compose) must be added to a zone using firewall-cmd.
Without a zone defined, firewalld will prohibit any communication between containers using that bridge.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: