Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Join column index names #1138

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Join column index names #1138

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

stanlemon
Copy link

@Ocramius recommended I open this up to discuss the issue I am seeing.

I am trying to explicitly name the index on a column which is used in a join. I've attempted to add two functional tests in this PR to demonstrate what I am seeing. Please forgive me if these tests are not correctly, this is the first time I've attempted to submit a PR like this.

There are two situations I am encountering...

First, I explicitly name the index in the @Table annotation on the column used in the join - but the SQL generated from SchemaTool appears to be a random hash.

Second, when I have an existing database table with an existing index and it's named properly (in this example, idx_maker_id) and then I run SchemaTool->updateSchema() it drops the index with the proper name and creates a new randomly hashed name.

Is there a different way of accomplishing what I am trying to do here, or is this a bug?

Thanks for your help and assistance!

@doctrinebot
Copy link

Hello,

thank you for creating this pull request. I have automatically opened an issue
on our Jira Bug Tracker for you. See the issue link:

http://www.doctrine-project.org/jira/browse/DDC-3310

We use Jira to track the state of pull requests and the versions they got
included in.

*/
protected $maker;

public function getId()
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please remove any code not related with the test

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you mean the getter/setters?

@Ocramius
Copy link
Member

This may have been fixed by doctrine/dbal#769, please re-check.

@stanlemon
Copy link
Author

Just checked one of my projects and my alters list is significantly smaller after updating dbal. Cursory glance I don't see any previously generated indexes being dropped and created in the alters either. Thanks!

@stanlemon stanlemon closed this Jan 14, 2015
@Ocramius
Copy link
Member

Thanks for checking, @stanlemon!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants