Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 30, 2018. It is now read-only.

has features should be defined with overwrite #341

Closed
kitsonk opened this issue Jun 16, 2017 · 0 comments
Closed

has features should be defined with overwrite #341

kitsonk opened this issue Jun 16, 2017 · 0 comments
Assignees
@rorticus
Labels
beta3 bug
Milestone
2017.08

Comments

@kitsonk
Copy link
Member

kitsonk commented Jun 16, 2017

Bug

has() features should be defined with overwrite. This ensures that if someone does include a 3rd party library that has name space collisions with features core and downstream packages depend upon, they are guaranteed to get the authoritative version instead of an exception the feature is already defined.
@kitsonk kitsonk added the bug label Jun 16, 2017
@dylans dylans added this to the 2017.06 milestone Jun 17, 2017
@dylans dylans modified the milestones: 2017.06, 2017.07 Jul 4, 2017
@kitsonk kitsonk added the beta3 label Jul 27, 2017
@kitsonk kitsonk modified the milestones: 2017.08, 2017.07 Jul 27, 2017
rorticus added a commit to rorticus/core that referenced this issue Jul 28, 2017
@rorticus
Adding overwrite flag to has flags, issue dojo#341
e4fb90a
@rorticus rorticus mentioned this issue Jul 28, 2017
Merged
3 tasks
rorticus added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 31, 2017
@rorticus
Adding overwrite flag to has flags, issue #341 (#349)
806b22c
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@rorticus rorticus

Labels
beta3 bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2017.08
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@dylans @kitsonk @rorticus