Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update has doc for clairty #129

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 4, 2018
Merged

Update has doc for clairty #129

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 4, 2018

Conversation

KaneFreeman
Copy link
Member

Type: bug / feature

The following has been addressed in the PR:

Description:
Update the initial description of the has function to make its purpose more clear, especially with regards to features not added to the module prior to the use of has.

Resolves #99

Update the initial description of the has function to make its purpose more clear, especially with regards to features not added to the module prior to the use of has.
@jsf-clabot
Copy link

jsf-clabot commented Oct 4, 2018

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 4, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #129 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #129   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.05%   97.05%           
=======================================
  Files          93       93           
  Lines        4961     4961           
  Branches     1089     1089           
=======================================
  Hits         4815     4815           
  Misses        146      146

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7dec0e8...72f415e. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@matt-gadd matt-gadd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the contribution!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants