chore(katana-pool): rename error for clarity #2528
Conversation
WalkthroughOhayo, sensei! The pull request modifies the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Transaction
participant Validator
User->>Transaction: Submit transaction
Transaction->>Validator: Validate transaction
Validator->>Validator: Check transaction fees
alt Fees too low
Validator-->>Transaction: Return InvalidTransactionError::IntrinsicFeeTooLow
else Fees sufficient
Validator-->>Transaction: Proceed with transaction
end
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
crates/katana/pool/src/validation/stateful.rs (1)
212-212: Ohayo, sensei! Nice work on improving error clarity.The renaming from
InsufficientMaxFeetoIntrinsicFeeTooLowprovides a more precise description of the error condition. This change aligns well with theTransactionFeeError::MaxFeeTooLowcase being handled.For even better clarity, consider updating the variable names
max_feeandmin_feeto reflect the intrinsic fee concept. Here's a suggestion:- let max_fee = max_fee.0; - let min_fee = min_fee.0; - Ok(InvalidTransactionError::IntrinsicFeeTooLow { max_fee, min: min_fee }) + let provided_fee = max_fee.0; + let required_fee = min_fee.0; + Ok(InvalidTransactionError::IntrinsicFeeTooLow { provided: provided_fee, required: required_fee })This change would make the error message even more descriptive and easier to understand.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- crates/katana/pool/src/validation/mod.rs (2 hunks)
- crates/katana/pool/src/validation/stateful.rs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
crates/katana/pool/src/validation/mod.rs (2)
31-46: Ohayo, sensei! This change looks great!The new
IntrinsicFeeTooLowvariant is a significant improvement over the previousInsufficientMaxFee. It provides clearer context and better describes the specific error condition. The detailed documentation is particularly helpful in explaining the purpose and timing of this check.
61-61: Ohayo again, sensei! Nice catch on the capitalization!The capitalization of the
NonAccounterror message improves consistency. It's a small but important detail that contributes to the overall quality of the codebase.To ensure we haven't missed any similar inconsistencies, let's check other error messages in this file:
If this script returns any results, we might want to capitalize those error messages as well for consistency.
✅ Verification successful
Ohayo again, sensei! It seems the previous script encountered a regex parse error. Let's enable PCRE2 to handle the look-around.
Ohayo again, sensei! The error message capitalization is consistent across the board. Great job!
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for inconsistent error message capitalization in InvalidTransactionError rg --type rust '#\[error\("(?!Sender|Max fee|Invalid transaction nonce)[a-z]' crates/katana/pool/src/validation/mod.rsLength of output: 395
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for inconsistent error message capitalization in InvalidTransactionError with PCRE2 enabled rg --pcre2 --type rust '#\[error\("(?!Sender|Max fee|Invalid transaction nonce)[a-z]' crates/katana/pool/src/validation/mod.rsLength of output: 128
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
crates/katana/pool/src/validation/mod.rs (1)
4-5: Ohayo again, sensei! The enum changes look great, with a small suggestion.The renaming of
InsufficientMaxFeetoIntrinsicFeeTooLowprovides more clarity about the nature of the error. The capitalization of theNonAccounterror message also improves consistency.These changes align well with the PR objective of renaming an error for clarity. Great job!
Consider updating the field names in the
IntrinsicFeeTooLowvariant for even more clarity:- IntrinsicFeeTooLow { min: u128, max_fee: u128 } + IntrinsicFeeTooLow { required_fee: u128, provided_fee: u128 }This change would make it immediately clear which fee is too low and what the required fee is.
crates/katana/pool/src/validation/error.rs (2)
5-5: Ohayo, sensei! Let's address the TODO comment.There's a TODO at line 5 suggesting to figure out how to combine this with
ExecutionError. IntegratingInvalidTransactionErrorwithExecutionErrorcould streamline error handling and reduce redundancy.Would you like assistance in drafting a proposal for this integration or opening a GitHub issue to track this task?
42-43: Ohayo, sensei! Regarding the specific error type forValidationFailure.The TODO at lines 42-43 suggests that the
errorfield should be a more specific error type rather than a genericString. Defining a custom error type can enhance error handling by providing more structured and detailed information.Would you like assistance in defining a more specific error type for the
ValidationFailurevariant, perhaps by creating a dedicatedValidationErrorenum?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- crates/katana/pool/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/katana/pool/src/pool.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/katana/pool/src/validation/error.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/katana/pool/src/validation/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/katana/rpc/rpc-types/src/error/starknet.rs (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- crates/katana/pool/src/pool.rs
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (5)
crates/katana/pool/src/lib.rs (2)
15-17: Ohayo, sensei! Nice work on reorganizing the imports!The separation of
InvalidTransactionErrorandValidatorimports enhances code clarity. ImportingInvalidTransactionErrorfrom the specificerrormodule provides better organization and makes the code structure more apparent.
Line range hint
1-67: Ohayo again, sensei! Let's wrap this up!The changes to the import statements are the only modifications in this file. These changes don't affect the functionality of the code, including the
PoolErrorenum and theTransactionPooltrait. The refactoring improves code organization without introducing any issues.crates/katana/pool/src/validation/mod.rs (1)
1-4: Ohayo, sensei! LGTM on the import changes.The addition of the
error::InvalidTransactionErrorimport improves code organization by separating error definitions into their own module. This change enhances modularity and makes the codebase more maintainable.crates/katana/rpc/rpc-types/src/error/starknet.rs (2)
185-185: Ohayo again, sensei! The error variant update is a nice improvement.The change from
InvalidTransactionError::InsufficientMaxFeetoInvalidTransactionError::IntrinsicFeeTooLowprovides more clarity about the nature of the error. It's good that the mapping toStarknetApiError::InsufficientMaxFeeremains consistent, maintaining backwards compatibility.Let's verify if there are any remaining usages of the old variant name:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usages of the old InvalidTransactionError variant # Test: Search for old variant name. Expect: No results. rg --type rust "InvalidTransactionError::InsufficientMaxFee" # Test: Search for new variant name. Expect: At least one result (this file). rg --type rust "InvalidTransactionError::IntrinsicFeeTooLow"
4-4: Ohayo, sensei! The import path update looks good.The change in the import path for
InvalidTransactionErrorreflects a restructuring of thekatana_poolcrate. This is a positive change that improves the organization of the code.To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's verify if all other imports of
InvalidTransactionErrorhave been updated:✅ Verification successful
Ohayo, sensei! It looks like there was a syntax error in the previous script. Let's try running the corrected version to ensure all
InvalidTransactionErrorimport paths have been updated:
Ohayo, sensei! Great job on the initial verification. To make sure everything is in order, let's double-check that all files, including
stateful.rs, have updated theirInvalidTransactionErrorimports correctly:
Ohayo, sensei! Import path update confirmed!
All instances of
InvalidTransactionErrorhave been successfully updated to use the new pathkatana_pool::validation::error::InvalidTransactionError. No old import paths remain in the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining old import paths of InvalidTransactionError # Test: Search for old import paths. Expect: No results. rg --type rust "use katana_pool::validation::InvalidTransactionError" # Test: Search for new import paths. Expect: At least one result (this file). rg --type rust "use katana_pool::validation::error::InvalidTransactionError"Length of output: 497
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining old import paths of InvalidTransactionError # Test: Search for old import paths. Expect: No results. rg --type rust "use katana_pool::validation::InvalidTransactionError" # Test: Search for new import paths. Expect: At least one result (this file). rg --type rust "use katana_pool::validation::error::InvalidTransactionError"Length of output: 261
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all 'use' statements for InvalidTransactionError use the new path # Check for any 'use' statements with the new import path rg --type rust "use katana_pool::validation::error::InvalidTransactionError" # Specifically verify 'stateful.rs' has the updated import rg --type rust "use katana_pool::validation::error::InvalidTransactionError" crates/katana/pool/src/validation/stateful.rsLength of output: 314
| #[error("Intrinsic transaction fee is too low")] | ||
| IntrinsicFeeTooLow { | ||
| /// The minimum required for the transaction to be executed. | ||
| min: u128, | ||
| /// The specified transaction fee. | ||
| max_fee: u128, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing the error message for clarity.
Including the min and max_fee values in the IntrinsicFeeTooLow error message can provide better context and align with the error message format used in InsufficientFunds. This will help users understand exactly why their transaction fee is considered too low.
You might update the error annotation as follows:
-#[error("Intrinsic transaction fee is too low")]
+#[error("Intrinsic transaction fee is too low. Minimum required: {min}; provided: {max_fee}.")]📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| #[error("Intrinsic transaction fee is too low")] | |
| IntrinsicFeeTooLow { | |
| /// The minimum required for the transaction to be executed. | |
| min: u128, | |
| /// The specified transaction fee. | |
| max_fee: u128, | |
| }, | |
| #[error("Intrinsic transaction fee is too low. Minimum required: {min}; provided: {max_fee}.")] | |
| IntrinsicFeeTooLow { | |
| /// The minimum required for the transaction to be executed. | |
| min: u128, | |
| /// The specified transaction fee. | |
| max_fee: u128, | |
| }, |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2528 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 69.34% 69.31% -0.04%
==========================================
Files 387 388 +1
Lines 49988 49988
==========================================
- Hits 34664 34648 -16
- Misses 15324 15340 +16 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
IntrinsicFeeTooLow, enhancing clarity for users regarding minimum fee requirements.Bug Fixes
Style