Sync-over-sync in EF6 code sample

[daonguyen120688]

I have a concern about the below code block:

using (var context = new BlogContext())
{
    context.Database.Log = Console.Write;

    var blog = context.Blogs.First(b => b.Title == "One Unicorn");

    blog.Posts.First().Title = "Green Eggs and Ham";

    blog.Posts.Add(new Post { Title = "I do not like them!" });

    context.SaveChangesAsync().Wait();
}

Why do you provide an example that use .Wait()? I think it's a bad practice and can make developers misunderstand and go the wrong way while using asynchronous programming. In my opinion, you should provide a sample code that follows the best practice in order to make it more helpful to the reader.

---

Document Details

⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

• ID: 97eca854-650c-5c9e-25f2-e5e92e91c310
• Version Independent ID: be1279e0-ce03-8b44-bdf7-d9d173aba9b7
• Content: Logging and intercepting database operations - EF6
• Content Source: entity-framework/ef6/fundamentals/logging-and-interception.md
• Product: entity-framework
• Technology: entity-framework-6
• GitHub Login: @ajcvickers
• Microsoft Alias: avickers

[roji]

Thanks, submitted #3899 to make this use simple, sync-only code.