new data hub #3836
new data hub #3836
Conversation
| text: "Microsoft.Data.Sqlite overview" | ||
| - url: /sql/ | ||
| text: "Microsoft SQL documentation" | ||
| - url: /azure/postgresql/flexible-server/connect-csharp |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we want to point to an Azure-specific page for the general MSSQL link? Could be confusing (maybe at least amend the text)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
that page has both Azure and on-premises docs
| text: "Use C# .NET to connect and query data in Azure Database for MySQL" | ||
|
|
||
| # Card | ||
| - title: Document databases |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So it's a bit odd to have many links for just a single database under "Document databases" 😉 Maybe just call this card "Cosmos"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The intent is for people new to .NET/etc. They won't search for Cosmos, but rather "document database" and the one we happen to have is Cosmos.
| text: "EF Core Azure Cosmos DB provider" | ||
|
|
||
| # Card | ||
| - title: Graph databases |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
MSSQL also has graph capabilities: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/relational-databases/graphs/sql-graph-architecture?view=sql-server-ver15
| text: "Overview" | ||
|
|
||
| # Card | ||
| - title: EF Core |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Does EF Core belong under "Databases", as opposed to maybe Data Services below?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
great point! I'm mixed thoughts. To me discoverability is the most important and when looking at databases, seems not like a bad thing to include "this is our recommended way to connect to databases (in most scenarios).
| text: "Analyze it!" | ||
|
|
||
| # Card | ||
| - title: SignalR |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes, it's one of the preferred ways in .NET to send/receive realtime/streaming data
| text: "Analyze it!" | ||
|
|
||
| # Card | ||
| - title: gRPC |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Would probably bump this up - it definitely seems more important than CoreWCF at the least.
| brand: dotnet | ||
|
|
||
| metadata: | ||
| title: .NET data documentation |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we style it .NET Data? (everywhere) This just makes me ask, "What's data documentation?"
|
If @smitpatel is able to take a quick look, I will merge after his approval. |
Initial layout for new data hub. Addresses #3833