Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: Feature | Introduce "Pool Idle Timeout" connection property #348

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

cheenamalhotra
Copy link
Member

Fixes #343

get { return _poolIdleTimeout; }
set
{
if (value < 0)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This check for <0 will mean that users can't set it to the default value of -1 to return to the default behaviour which seems counter intuitive, both removing and setting to default value should normally yield the same result I think.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We're only accepting values 0 to Int32.Max as documented here.

This customized behaviour is disabled by default (hence -1) so setting to anything other than the range is essentially not allowed.

Same is with Connection Timeout although it's default is 15 secs. We not really obstructing default value, but anything beyond range. I was also thinking of whether I should also check for Max value here, but didn't see that at other places, but maybe we should check everywhere?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This customized behaviour is disabled by default (hence -1) so setting to anything other than the range is essentially not allowed.

Sure, but if you enable it how do you then disable it without starting again with a new connection string builder? Or is that not a suggested use case?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes you're right. I will change it to < -1.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is 0 a useful value to allow? I would expect that to instantly dispose of pools which is the same thing as just not using pooling.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The behavior is same, yes. Allowing 0 or not, doesn't seem a problem to me.

@David-Engel if you could confirm the range as well, I can update code accordingly.

@cheenamalhotra cheenamalhotra changed the title Feature | Introduce "Pool Idle Timeout" connection property WIP: Feature | Introduce "Pool Idle Timeout" connection property Dec 13, 2019
Base automatically changed from master to main March 15, 2021 17:54
@JRahnama
Copy link
Contributor

Closing as this is not mergeable. Feel free to open a new PR for this feature.

@JRahnama JRahnama closed this Jun 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add Pool Idle Timeout to control connection pool
3 participants