- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 316
Adding support for .NET 10 #3686
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
Copilot reviewed 11 out of 11 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
        
          
                src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient/tests/UnitTests/TdsParserInternalsTest.cs
              
                Outdated
          
            Show resolved
            Hide resolved
        
              
          
                ...crosoft.Data.SqlClient/tests/ManualTests/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.ManualTesting.Tests.csproj
              
                Outdated
          
            Show resolved
            Hide resolved
        
      There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think your best bet will be to update the pipelines to install the .NET 10 SDK (instead of .NET 9 SDK), and ensure that we use .NET 10 SDK to build and run the test projects.
The driver projects must remain using .NET 9 SDK to build.
Hmm... I don't think we can separate this out in our current pipelines. Let's just use the .NET 10 SDK for everything and see how it goes.
        
          
                .../AzureKeyVaultProvider/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.AlwaysEncrypted.AzureKeyVaultProvider.csproj
          
            Show resolved
            Hide resolved
        
              
          
                ...crosoft.Data.SqlClient/tests/ManualTests/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.ManualTesting.Tests.csproj
              
                Outdated
          
            Show resolved
            Hide resolved
        
      | <OutputType>Exe</OutputType> | ||
| <AssemblyName>PerformanceTests</AssemblyName> | ||
| <TargetFrameworks>net8.0;net9.0</TargetFrameworks> | ||
| <TargetFrameworks>net8.0;net9.0;net10.0</TargetFrameworks> | 
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So, making this change will require that we start using the .NET 10 SDK to build the tests everywhere (locally as devs and during all pipelines).
For devs, that's fine - we just need to install the .NET 10 SDK wherever we're developing. We will need to update the BUILDGUIDE.md to reflect this new requiremet.
For pipelines, we will need to find everywhere that we perform a build of the tests and add a step that installs the .NET 10 SDK. If you do this, then you can use the existing CI pipelines to verify .NET 10 compatibility rather than trying to get the tests to run for you locally (which is close to impossible currently).
|  | ||
| <!-- Published - Target Framework Specific Dependencies --> | ||
| <ItemGroup Condition="'$(TargetFramework)' == 'net9.0'"> | ||
| <ItemGroup Condition="'$(TargetFramework)' == 'net9.0' or '$(TargetFramework)' == 'net10.0'"> | 
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You could use $([MSBuild]::VersionGreaterThanOrEquals(...)) here and below.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I made this change and tried building the driver code but it resulted in below error:
error MSB4184: The express
ion "[MSBuild]::VersionGreaterThanOrEquals('', net9.0)" cannot be evaluated. Version string was not in a correct format.
On checking further could understand that since we have multi-targetting with TargetFrameworks, MSBuild sets $(TargetFramework) for each target during the build, but during initial evaluation or restore, it may be unset leading to $TargetFramework being empty which caused above error.
Hence, I believe its rather safe to use below:
•	It directly checks for the exact target frameworks you want (net9.0 or net10.0).
•	It avoids MSBuild errors if $(TargetFramework) is empty or not a valid version string.
•	It is more readable and less error-prone than using VersionGreaterThanOrEquals, which can fail if the property is not set.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Have a look at the docs for VersionGreaterThanOrEquals here:
You could also try using IsTargetFrameworkCompatible:
$([MSBuild]::IsTargetFrameworkCompatible($(TargetFramework), 'net9.0'))
That should be false when $(TargetFramework) is net8.0, and true for net9.0 and net10.0.
I think that is actually better than using VersionGreaterThanOrEquals.
| 
 @paulmedynski I've been thinking about this. We can start publishing a .NET 10 dll with only a minor version bump. Maybe we target our spring 7.1 release for that addition. At that point it should be better supported in all the build tooling. | 
| /azp run | 
| Azure Pipelines will not run the associated pipelines, because the pull request was updated after the run command was issued. Review the pull request again and issue a new run command. | 
…s it was failing without this dependency. I have now reverted my changes.
| @priyankatiwari08 please read the following Contributor License Agreement(CLA). If you agree with the CLA, please reply with the following information. 
 Contributor License AgreementContribution License AgreementThis Contribution License Agreement ( “Agreement” ) is agreed to by the party signing below ( “You” ), 1. Definitions. “Code” means the computer software code, whether in human-readable or machine-executable form, “Project” means any of the projects owned or managed by .NET Foundation and offered under a license “Submit” is the act of uploading, submitting, transmitting, or distributing code or other content to any “Submission” means the Code and any other copyrightable material Submitted by You, including any 2. Your Submission. You must agree to the terms of this Agreement before making a Submission to any 3. Originality of Work.  You represent that each of Your Submissions is entirely Your 4. Your Employer. References to “employer” in this Agreement include Your employer or anyone else 5. Licenses. a. Copyright License. You grant .NET Foundation, and those who receive the Submission directly b. Patent License. You grant .NET Foundation, and those who receive the Submission directly or c. Other Rights Reserved. Each party reserves all rights not expressly granted in this Agreement. 6. Representations and Warranties. You represent that You are legally entitled to grant the above 7. Notice to .NET Foundation. You agree to notify .NET Foundation in writing of any facts or 8. Information about Submissions. You agree that contributions to Projects and information about 9. Governing Law/Jurisdiction. This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Washington, and 10. Entire Agreement/Assignment. This Agreement is the entire agreement between the parties, and .NET Foundation dedicates this Contribution License Agreement to the public domain according to the Creative Commons CC0 1. | 
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
Copilot reviewed 14 out of 14 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)
src/Directory.Packages.props:49
- The condition for Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting should be updated to include net10.0, similar to the other updated conditions in this file. Currently, net10.0 builds will fall into the 'not equal' condition on line 53, which may not be the intended behavior given the pattern established elsewhere in this file.
  <ItemGroup Condition="'$(TargetFramework)' == 'net9.0'">
        
          
                src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient/src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.csproj
              
                Outdated
          
            Show resolved
            Hide resolved
        
      …lling .NET 10 steps in pipelines are failing for macOS and Ubuntu platform.
…SqlClient into dev/prtiwar/net10support
| /azp run | 
| Azure Pipelines failed to run 2 pipeline(s). | 
| /azp run | 
| Azure Pipelines failed to run 2 pipeline(s). | 
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
| /azp run | 
| Azure Pipelines failed to run 2 pipeline(s). | 
Removed 'includePreviewVersions' parameter from the build step.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would also be nice to expirment with the workaround documented here to see if we can eliminate the ensure-dotnet-version.yml template:
microsoft/azure-pipelines-tasks#16501 (comment)
And the alternate way to determine architecture here:
microsoft/azure-pipelines-tasks#20300 (comment)
That would de-clutter the job steps that look like we're repeatedly trying to install SDKs and remove our PowerShell foo.
| includePreviewVersions: true | ||
|  | ||
| - task: UseDotNet@2 | ||
| displayName: 'Use .NET 9.x sdk' | 
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Now that we're installing the .NET 10 SDK everywhere, we can change all of these .NET 9 installs to 'runtime'.  We don't need the .NET 9 SDK for anything.  Do this for the UseDotNet@2 tasks and calls to the ensure-dotnet-version.yml template.
| <OutputType>Exe</OutputType> | ||
| <StartupObject>Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.ExtUtilities.Runner</StartupObject> | ||
| <TargetFrameworks>net9.0</TargetFrameworks> | ||
| <TargetFrameworks>net9.0;net10.0</TargetFrameworks> | 
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You can remove net9.0 here.  This project builds a tool that we use during the build, so it only needs to target one runtime.
| <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.IdentityModel.JsonWebTokens" /> | ||
| <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.IdentityModel.Protocols.OpenIdConnect" /> | ||
| <PackageReference Include="System.Buffers" /> | ||
| <!--<PackageReference Include="System.Buffers" />--> | 
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tidy up these commented-out lines.
Description
As part of adding support for .NET 10 below changes has been done:
Added conditional logic for PackageReference entries for assemblies which are now included in the .NET 10 Base Class Library. Without this change, keeping them caused runtime redundancy and potential NU1510 errors during SDK pruning:
Enabled multi-targeting for .NET 10 in test projects to ensure compatibility and proper coverage.
Issues
#3576
Customer issue: #3522