-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 533
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Xamarin.Android.Build.Tasks] Invokers after abstracts in typemaps #9545
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Fixes: #9535 TODO: description.
Fixes: #9535 Context: a017561 Context: 35f41dc Create a new .NET for Android project (`dotnet new android`), add a `@(PackageReference)` to [Xamarin.AndroidX.Media3.ExoPlayer][0], and add the following code: var builder = new AndroidX.Media3.ExoPlayer.ExoPlayerBuilder(this); var player = builder.Build(); Build and run in *Debug* configuration, and it crashes: System.ArgumentException: Could not determine Java type corresponding to `AndroidX.Media3.ExoPlayer.IExoPlayerInvoker, Xamarin.AndroidX.Media3.ExoPlayer, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null`. (Parameter 'targetType') at Java.Interop.TypeManager.CreateInstance(IntPtr handle, JniHandleOwnership transfer, Type targetType) in /Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/src/Mono.Android/Java.Interop/TypeManager.cs:line 323 at Java.Lang.Object.GetObject(IntPtr handle, JniHandleOwnership transfer, Type type) in /Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/src/Mono.Android/Java.Lang/Object.cs:line 302 at Java.Lang.Object._GetObject[IExoPlayer](IntPtr handle, JniHandleOwnership transfer) in /Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/src/Mono.Android/Java.Lang/Object.cs:line 288 at Java.Lang.Object.GetObject[IExoPlayer](IntPtr handle, JniHandleOwnership transfer) in /Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/src/Mono.Android/Java.Lang/Object.cs:line 280 at AndroidX.Media3.ExoPlayer.ExoPlayerBuilder.Build() in D:\a\_work\1\s\generated\androidx.media3.media3-exoplayer\obj\Release\net8.0-android\generated\src\AndroidX.Media3.ExoPlayer.IExoPlayer.cs:line 749 at media3.MainActivity.OnCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) in /Users/moljac/Downloads/1036/media3/MainActivity.cs:line 16 at Android.App.Activity.n_OnCreate_Landroid_os_Bundle_(IntPtr jnienv, IntPtr native__this, IntPtr native_savedInstanceState) in /Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/src/Mono.Android/obj/Release/net9.0/android-35/mcw/Android.App.Activity.cs:line 3196 at Android.Runtime.JNINativeWrapper.Wrap_JniMarshal_PPL_V(_JniMarshal_PPL_V callback, IntPtr jnienv, IntPtr klazz, IntPtr p0) in /Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/src/Mono.Android/Android.Runtime/JNINativeWrapper.g.cs:line 121☹️ The problem, as often appears to be the case these days, is an unexpected interaction between different things. Firstly, the *immediate* cause of the crash is 35f41dc, which updated `TypeManager.CreateInstance()` to attempt to lookup the Java type that corresponds to a possible `*Invoker` type: // `type` is `typeof(AndroidX.Media3.ExoPlayer.IExoPlayerInvoker)` var typeSig = JNIEnvInit.androidRuntime?.TypeManager.GetTypeSignature (type) ?? default; if (!typeSig.IsValid || typeSig.SimpleReference == null) { throw new ArgumentException ($"Could not determine Java type corresponding to `{type.AssemblyQualifiedName}`.", nameof (targetType)); } The underlying cause of the crash, and what 35f41dc uncovered, is that *there is no type mapping for `IExoPlayerInvoker`*. This is (not quite) readily seen by examining the generated file: % grep IExoPlayerInvoker obj/Debug/net*android*/android/typemaps.arm64-v8a.ll # no match This is also true on .NET 8: there is no type mapping for `IExoPlayerInvoker`. There *are* type mappings for *other* interface types, e.g. `IIntSupplier`: % grep IIntSupplier obj/Debug/net*android*/android/typemaps.arm64-v8a.ll @.TypeMapEntry.16871_from = private unnamed_addr constant [47 x i8] c"Java.Util.Functions.IIntSupplier, Mono.Android\00", align 1 @.TypeMapEntry.16873_from = private unnamed_addr constant [54 x i8] c"Java.Util.Functions.IIntSupplierInvoker, Mono.Android\00", align 1 A bit more digging around, and the "problem" is as follows: type map generation had a *type ordering* requirement, and needed the `Invoker` types to *follow* their corresponding abstract types. # Mono.Android.dll: IIntSupplier is before IIntSupplierInvoker % monodis --typedef obj/Debug/net9.0-android/android/assets/arm64-v8a/Mono.Android.dll | grep IIntSupplier 7676: Java.Util.Functions.IIntSupplier (flist=57465, mlist=135759, flags=0x1000a1, extends=0x0) 7677: Java.Util.Functions.IIntSupplierInvoker (flist=57465, mlist=135760, flags=0x100000, extends=0x7c28) # Xamarin.AndroidX.Media3.ExoPlayer.dll: IExoPlayerInvoker is *before* IExoPlayer % monodis --typedef obj/Debug/net9.0-android/android/assets/arm64-v8a/Xamarin.AndroidX.Media3.ExoPlayer.dll| grep IExoPlayer 139: AndroidX.Media3.ExoPlayer.IExoPlayerInvoker (flist=20, mlist=567, flags=0x100000, extends=0x85) … 166: AndroidX.Media3.ExoPlayer.IExoPlayer (flist=598, mlist=1671, flags=0x1000a1, extends=0x0) Reasonable aside: *why* is `IExoPlayerInvoker` before `IExoPlayer`? Because it's a ["real" checked-in copy of generated code][1], not generated code that follows the `IExoPlayer` generated declaration. The reason why ordering matters comes from a017561: > Update typemap generation code in `Xamarin.Android.Build.Tasks.dll` so > that all the duplicate Java type names will point to the same managed > type name. Additionally, make sure we select the managed type in the > same fashion the old typemap generator in `Java.Interop` worked: prefer > base types to the derived ones if the type is an interface or an > abstract class. The effect of this change is that no matter which > entry `EmbeddedAssemblies::binary_search()` ends up selecting it will > always return the same managed type name for all aliased Java types. The `TypeMapGenerator.HandleDebugDuplicates()` method from a017561 implicitly preferred the first TypeDefinition encountered for a given Java type. When the `*Invoker` came first, it attempted to treat it as a duplicate, but wound up *removing* it entirely: oldEntry.TypeDefinition = td; oldEntry.ManagedName = GetManagedTypeName (td); `oldEntry.TypeDefinition` would refer to `IExoPlayerInvoker`, and setting it to `td` would instead set it to `IExoPlayer`. `IExoPlayerInvoker` is lost. Fix this by updating `HandleDebugDuplicates()` to be clearer about intent: // oldEntry == typeof(IExoPlayerInvoker) // td == typeof(IExoPlayer) if ((td.IsAbstract || td.IsInterface) && !oldEntry.TypeDefinition.IsAbstract && !oldEntry.TypeDefinition.IsInterface && td.IsAssignableFrom (oldEntry.TypeDefinition, cache)) { // We found the `Invoker` type *before* the declared type // Fix things up so the abstract type is first, and the `Invoker` is considered a duplicate. duplicates.Insert (0, entry); oldEntry.SkipInJavaToManaged = false; } Now, when the "new" TypeDefinition is: 1. An abstract class or interface type, and 2. The original entry is *neither* an abstract class nor interface, & 3. The old entry can be assigned to the new entry, then we assume that this is a `*Invoker` scenario, ensure things are consistent with the "expected" { IExoPlayer, IExoPlayerInvoker } order: 1. Inserting the new TypeDefinition *first* in `duplicates`. This ensures expected ordering. 2. Setting `oldEntry.SkipInJavaToManaged` to `false`. This ensures that `IExoPlayerInvoker` is emitted in the typemaps. ***WORKAROUND***: Building the app in Release configuration avoids the crash. (Then cry about inner dev loop performance.) "But what about tests?" Originally, @jonpryor thought that `JavaObjectExtensionsTests.JavaCast_InterfaceCast()` was a sufficient test. This was wrong, because it didn't test what it thought it did: IntPtr g; using (var n = new Java.Lang.Integer (42)) { g = JNIEnv.NewGlobalRef (n.Handle); } // We want a Java.Lang.Object so that we create an IComparableInvoker // instead of just getting back the original instance. using (var o = Java.Lang.Object.GetObject<Java.Lang.Object> (g, JniHandleOwnership.TransferGlobalRef)) { var c = JavaObjectExtensions.JavaCast<Java.Lang.IComparable> (o); c.Dispose (); } The comment is not quite right: while it *says* we want a `Java.Lang.Object`, that's not the runtime type `o.GetType()`. The runtime type `o.GetType()` would be `Java.Lang.Integer` (!), *because* the first thing that `TypeManager.CreateInstance()` tries to do is see if we have an existing type mapping for the runtime type of the JNI handle. As the runtime type is `java.lang.Integer`, we *do* have such a binding, *and* that bound type is implicitly convertible to `Java.Lang.Object`. Meaning this test never actually tested an interface cast! So for starters, we need to fix this to something that *ensures* we get an unbound type in the base class hierarchy, so that we can actually test interface checking behavior. Enter `@(AndroidJavaSource)`, `ValueProvider.java`, and `Example.java`. `Example.getValueProvider()` returns an anonymous inner class that implements `ValueProvider`, ensuring that the only bound type that will work is `Java.Lang.Object`. We then can use `JavaObjectExtensions.JavaCast<T>()` as originally intended. We could have used any interface type instead of introducing a new `ValueProvider` interface, but introducing a new type is the only way to *attempt* to reproduce the TypeDefinition ordering issue, by adding a new `partial` class for `IValueProviderInvoker`. *Locally*, we get the intended "wrong" ordering of Invoker before abstract type: % monodis --typedef tests/Mono.Android-Tests/Runtime-Microsoft.Android.Sdk/obj/Debug/net9.0-android/Mono.Android.NET-Tests.dll | grep IValueProvider 5: Net.Dot.Android.Test.IValueProviderInvoker (flist=10, mlist=20, flags=0x100000, extends=0x89) 7: Net.Dot.Android.Test.IValueProvider (flist=13, mlist=37, flags=0x1000a1, extends=0x0) and the test passes as desired. [0]: https://www.nuget.org/packages/Xamarin.AndroidX.Media3.ExoPlayer/1.4.1 [1]: https://github.com/dotnet/android-libraries/blob/3c21f4643c5dfe74e64fec54e3679baf4dc8d067/source/androidx.media3/media3-exoplayer/Additions/AndroidX.Media3.ExoPlayer.IExoPlayer.cs#L10
jonpryor
changed the title
[Xamarin.Android.Build.Tasks] Allow invokers before abstracts
[Xamarin.Android.Build.Tasks] Invokers after abstracts in typemaps
Nov 22, 2024
grendello
approved these changes
Nov 22, 2024
jonpryor
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 22, 2024
…9545) Fixes: #9535 Context: a017561 Context: 35f41dc Create a new .NET for Android project (`dotnet new android`), add a `@(PackageReference)` to [Xamarin.AndroidX.Media3.ExoPlayer][0], and add the following code: var builder = new AndroidX.Media3.ExoPlayer.ExoPlayerBuilder(this); var player = builder.Build(); Build and run in *Debug* configuration, and it crashes: System.ArgumentException: Could not determine Java type corresponding to `AndroidX.Media3.ExoPlayer.IExoPlayerInvoker, Xamarin.AndroidX.Media3.ExoPlayer, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null`. (Parameter 'targetType') at Java.Interop.TypeManager.CreateInstance(IntPtr handle, JniHandleOwnership transfer, Type targetType) in /Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/src/Mono.Android/Java.Interop/TypeManager.cs:line 323 at Java.Lang.Object.GetObject(IntPtr handle, JniHandleOwnership transfer, Type type) in /Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/src/Mono.Android/Java.Lang/Object.cs:line 302 at Java.Lang.Object._GetObject[IExoPlayer](IntPtr handle, JniHandleOwnership transfer) in /Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/src/Mono.Android/Java.Lang/Object.cs:line 288 at Java.Lang.Object.GetObject[IExoPlayer](IntPtr handle, JniHandleOwnership transfer) in /Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/src/Mono.Android/Java.Lang/Object.cs:line 280 at AndroidX.Media3.ExoPlayer.ExoPlayerBuilder.Build() in D:\a\_work\1\s\generated\androidx.media3.media3-exoplayer\obj\Release\net8.0-android\generated\src\AndroidX.Media3.ExoPlayer.IExoPlayer.cs:line 749 at media3.MainActivity.OnCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) in /Users/moljac/Downloads/1036/media3/MainActivity.cs:line 16 at Android.App.Activity.n_OnCreate_Landroid_os_Bundle_(IntPtr jnienv, IntPtr native__this, IntPtr native_savedInstanceState) in /Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/src/Mono.Android/obj/Release/net9.0/android-35/mcw/Android.App.Activity.cs:line 3196 at Android.Runtime.JNINativeWrapper.Wrap_JniMarshal_PPL_V(_JniMarshal_PPL_V callback, IntPtr jnienv, IntPtr klazz, IntPtr p0) in /Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/src/Mono.Android/Android.Runtime/JNINativeWrapper.g.cs:line 121☹️ The problem, as often appears to be the case these days, is an unexpected interaction between different things. Firstly, the *immediate* cause of the crash is 35f41dc, which updated `TypeManager.CreateInstance()` to attempt to lookup the Java type that corresponds to a possible `*Invoker` type: // `type` is `typeof(AndroidX.Media3.ExoPlayer.IExoPlayerInvoker)` var typeSig = JNIEnvInit.androidRuntime?.TypeManager.GetTypeSignature (type) ?? default; if (!typeSig.IsValid || typeSig.SimpleReference == null) { throw new ArgumentException ($"Could not determine Java type corresponding to `{type.AssemblyQualifiedName}`.", nameof (targetType)); } The underlying cause of the crash, and what 35f41dc uncovered, is that *there is no type mapping for `IExoPlayerInvoker`*. This is (not quite) readily seen by examining the generated file: % grep IExoPlayerInvoker obj/Debug/net*android*/android/typemaps.arm64-v8a.ll # no match This is also true on .NET 8: there is no type mapping for `IExoPlayerInvoker`. There *are* type mappings for *other* interface types, e.g. `IIntSupplier`: % grep IIntSupplier obj/Debug/net*android*/android/typemaps.arm64-v8a.ll @.TypeMapEntry.16871_from = private unnamed_addr constant [47 x i8] c"Java.Util.Functions.IIntSupplier, Mono.Android\00", align 1 @.TypeMapEntry.16873_from = private unnamed_addr constant [54 x i8] c"Java.Util.Functions.IIntSupplierInvoker, Mono.Android\00", align 1 A bit more digging around, and the "problem" is as follows: type map generation had a *type ordering* requirement, and needed the `Invoker` types to *follow* their corresponding abstract types. # Mono.Android.dll: IIntSupplier is before IIntSupplierInvoker % monodis --typedef obj/Debug/net9.0-android/android/assets/arm64-v8a/Mono.Android.dll | grep IIntSupplier 7676: Java.Util.Functions.IIntSupplier (flist=57465, mlist=135759, flags=0x1000a1, extends=0x0) 7677: Java.Util.Functions.IIntSupplierInvoker (flist=57465, mlist=135760, flags=0x100000, extends=0x7c28) # Xamarin.AndroidX.Media3.ExoPlayer.dll: IExoPlayerInvoker is *before* IExoPlayer % monodis --typedef obj/Debug/net9.0-android/android/assets/arm64-v8a/Xamarin.AndroidX.Media3.ExoPlayer.dll| grep IExoPlayer 139: AndroidX.Media3.ExoPlayer.IExoPlayerInvoker (flist=20, mlist=567, flags=0x100000, extends=0x85) … 166: AndroidX.Media3.ExoPlayer.IExoPlayer (flist=598, mlist=1671, flags=0x1000a1, extends=0x0) Reasonable aside: *why* is `IExoPlayerInvoker` before `IExoPlayer`? Because it's a ["real" checked-in copy of generated code][1], not generated code that follows the `IExoPlayer` generated declaration. The reason why ordering matters comes from a017561: > Update typemap generation code in `Xamarin.Android.Build.Tasks.dll` so > that all the duplicate Java type names will point to the same managed > type name. Additionally, make sure we select the managed type in the > same fashion the old typemap generator in `Java.Interop` worked: prefer > base types to the derived ones if the type is an interface or an > abstract class. The effect of this change is that no matter which > entry `EmbeddedAssemblies::binary_search()` ends up selecting it will > always return the same managed type name for all aliased Java types. The `TypeMapGenerator.HandleDebugDuplicates()` method from a017561 implicitly preferred the first TypeDefinition encountered for a given Java type. When the `*Invoker` came first, it attempted to treat it as a duplicate, but wound up *removing* it entirely: oldEntry.TypeDefinition = td; oldEntry.ManagedName = GetManagedTypeName (td); `oldEntry.TypeDefinition` would refer to `IExoPlayerInvoker`, and setting it to `td` would instead set it to `IExoPlayer`. `IExoPlayerInvoker` is lost. Fix this by updating `HandleDebugDuplicates()` to be clearer about intent: // oldEntry == typeof(IExoPlayerInvoker) // td == typeof(IExoPlayer) if ((td.IsAbstract || td.IsInterface) && !oldEntry.TypeDefinition.IsAbstract && !oldEntry.TypeDefinition.IsInterface && td.IsAssignableFrom (oldEntry.TypeDefinition, cache)) { // We found the `Invoker` type *before* the declared type // Fix things up so the abstract type is first, and the `Invoker` is considered a duplicate. duplicates.Insert (0, entry); oldEntry.SkipInJavaToManaged = false; } Now, when the "new" TypeDefinition is: 1. An abstract class or interface type, and 2. The original entry is *neither* an abstract class nor interface, & 3. The old entry can be assigned to the new entry, then we assume that this is a `*Invoker` scenario, ensure things are consistent with the "expected" { IExoPlayer, IExoPlayerInvoker } order: 1. Inserting the new TypeDefinition *first* in `duplicates`. This ensures expected ordering. 2. Setting `oldEntry.SkipInJavaToManaged` to `false`. This ensures that `IExoPlayerInvoker` is emitted in the typemaps. ***WORKAROUND***: Building the app in Release configuration avoids the crash. (Then cry about inner dev loop performance.) "But what about tests?" Originally, @jonpryor thought that `JavaObjectExtensionsTests.JavaCast_InterfaceCast()` was a sufficient test. This was wrong, because it didn't test what it thought it did: IntPtr g; using (var n = new Java.Lang.Integer (42)) { g = JNIEnv.NewGlobalRef (n.Handle); } // We want a Java.Lang.Object so that we create an IComparableInvoker // instead of just getting back the original instance. using (var o = Java.Lang.Object.GetObject<Java.Lang.Object> (g, JniHandleOwnership.TransferGlobalRef)) { var c = JavaObjectExtensions.JavaCast<Java.Lang.IComparable> (o); c.Dispose (); } The comment is not quite right: while it *says* we want a `Java.Lang.Object`, that's not the runtime type `o.GetType()`. The runtime type `o.GetType()` would be `Java.Lang.Integer` (!), *because* the first thing that `TypeManager.CreateInstance()` tries to do is see if we have an existing type mapping for the runtime type of the JNI handle. As the runtime type is `java.lang.Integer`, we *do* have such a binding, *and* that bound type is implicitly convertible to `Java.Lang.Object`. Meaning this test never actually tested an interface cast! So for starters, we need to fix this to something that *ensures* we get an unbound type in the base class hierarchy, so that we can actually test interface checking behavior. Enter `@(AndroidJavaSource)`, `ValueProvider.java`, and `Example.java`. `Example.getValueProvider()` returns an anonymous inner class that implements `ValueProvider`, ensuring that the only bound type that will work is `Java.Lang.Object`. We then can use `JavaObjectExtensions.JavaCast<T>()` as originally intended. We could have used any interface type instead of introducing a new `ValueProvider` interface, but introducing a new type is the only way to *attempt* to reproduce the TypeDefinition ordering issue, by adding a new `partial` class for `IValueProviderInvoker`. *Locally*, we get the intended "wrong" ordering of Invoker before abstract type: % monodis --typedef tests/Mono.Android-Tests/Runtime-Microsoft.Android.Sdk/obj/Debug/net9.0-android/Mono.Android.NET-Tests.dll | grep IValueProvider 5: Net.Dot.Android.Test.IValueProviderInvoker (flist=10, mlist=20, flags=0x100000, extends=0x89) 7: Net.Dot.Android.Test.IValueProvider (flist=13, mlist=37, flags=0x1000a1, extends=0x0) and the test passes as desired. [0]: https://www.nuget.org/packages/Xamarin.AndroidX.Media3.ExoPlayer/1.4.1 [1]: https://github.com/dotnet/android-libraries/blob/3c21f4643c5dfe74e64fec54e3679baf4dc8d067/source/androidx.media3/media3-exoplayer/Additions/AndroidX.Media3.ExoPlayer.IExoPlayer.cs#L10
@jonpryor Any news on when a new service release is going to be published? We are depending on this fix to unblock us from upgrading to .net 9 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes: #9535
Context: a017561
Context: 35f41dc
Create a new .NET for Android project (
dotnet new android
), adda
@(PackageReference)
to Xamarin.AndroidX.Media3.ExoPlayer,and add the following code:
Build and run in Debug configuration, and it crashes:
The problem, as often appears to be the case these days, is an
unexpected interaction between different things.
Firstly, the immediate cause of the crash is 35f41dc, which
updated
TypeManager.CreateInstance()
to attempt to lookup the Javatype that corresponds to a possible
*Invoker
type:The underlying cause of the crash, and what 35f41dc uncovered, is
that there is no type mapping for
IExoPlayerInvoker
. This is(not quite) readily seen by examining the generated file:
This is also true on .NET 8: there is no type mapping for
IExoPlayerInvoker
.There are type mappings for other interface types, e.g.
IIntSupplier
:A bit more digging around, and the "problem" is as follows: type map
generation had a type ordering requirement, and needed the
Invoker
types to follow their corresponding abstract types.Reasonable aside: why is
IExoPlayerInvoker
beforeIExoPlayer
?Because it's a "real" checked-in copy of generated code, not
generated code that follows the
IExoPlayer
generated declaration.The reason why ordering matters comes from a017561:
The
TypeMapGenerator.HandleDebugDuplicates()
method from a017561implicitly preferred the first TypeDefinition encountered for a given
Java type. When the
*Invoker
came first, it attempted to treat itas a duplicate, but wound up removing it entirely:
oldEntry.TypeDefinition
would refer toIExoPlayerInvoker
, andsetting it to
td
would instead set it toIExoPlayer
.IExoPlayerInvoker
is lost.Fix this by updating
HandleDebugDuplicates()
to be clearer aboutintent:
Now, when the "new" TypeDefinition is:
then we assume that this is a
*Invoker
scenario, ensure things areconsistent with the "expected" { IExoPlayer, IExoPlayerInvoker } order:
Inserting the new TypeDefinition first in
duplicates
.This ensures expected ordering.
Setting
oldEntry.SkipInJavaToManaged
tofalse
.This ensures that
IExoPlayerInvoker
is emitted in the typemaps.WORKAROUND: Building the app in Release configuration avoids
the crash. (Then cry about inner dev loop performance.)
"But what about tests?" Originally, @jonpryor thought that
JavaObjectExtensionsTests.JavaCast_InterfaceCast()
was a sufficienttest. This was wrong, because it didn't test what it thought it did:
The comment is not quite right: while it says we want a
Java.Lang.Object
, that's not the runtime typeo.GetType()
.The runtime type
o.GetType()
would beJava.Lang.Integer
(!),because the first thing that
TypeManager.CreateInstance()
triesto do is see if we have an existing type mapping for the runtime type
of the JNI handle. As the runtime type is
java.lang.Integer
, wedo have such a binding, and that bound type is implicitly
convertible to
Java.Lang.Object
.Meaning this test never actually tested an interface cast!
So for starters, we need to fix this to something that ensures we
get an unbound type in the base class hierarchy, so that we can
actually test interface checking behavior.
Enter
@(AndroidJavaSource)
,ValueProvider.java
, andExample.java
.Example.getValueProvider()
returns an anonymousinner class that implements
ValueProvider
, ensuring that the onlybound type that will work is
Java.Lang.Object
. We then can useJavaObjectExtensions.JavaCast<T>()
as originally intended.We could have used any interface type instead of introducing a new
ValueProvider
interface, but introducing a new type is the only wayto attempt to reproduce the TypeDefinition ordering issue, by
adding a new
partial
class forIValueProviderInvoker
.Locally, we get the intended "wrong" ordering of Invoker before
abstract type:
and the test passes as desired.