Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix condition for BuildAfterTargetingPack #60147

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 11, 2025
Merged

Conversation

wtgodbe
Copy link
Member

@wtgodbe wtgodbe commented Feb 1, 2025

We don't want to build this during source-build, but we do want to build it in the VMR.

Part of #60146

Test build https://dev.azure.com/dnceng/internal/_build/results?buildId=2633084&view=results

@wtgodbe wtgodbe requested a review from mmitche February 1, 2025 00:01
@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the area-infrastructure Includes: MSBuild projects/targets, build scripts, CI, Installers and shared framework label Feb 1, 2025
@@ -76,19 +76,19 @@
</MSBuild>
</Target>
Copy link
Member

@akoeplinger akoeplinger Feb 1, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should GetReferencesProvidedDelayedProjects be filtered out for source build as well?

@wtgodbe
Copy link
Member Author

wtgodbe commented Feb 6, 2025

Not working in VMR build, targeting pack layout isn't in the right place. Working on figuring out why

@wtgodbe
Copy link
Member Author

wtgodbe commented Feb 11, 2025

This works in the VMR build now

@wtgodbe wtgodbe merged commit dcf256a into main Feb 11, 2025
27 checks passed
@wtgodbe wtgodbe deleted the wtgodbe/BuildAfterTarg branch February 11, 2025 16:39
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot added this to the 10.0-preview2 milestone Feb 11, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-infrastructure Includes: MSBuild projects/targets, build scripts, CI, Installers and shared framework
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants