-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
Fixing documentation for code coverage #15174
Conversation
@dotnet-bot help |
Welcome to the dotnet/corefx Repository The following is a list of valid commands on this PR. To invoke a command, comment the indicated phrase on the PR The following commands are valid for all PRs and repositories. Click to expand
The following jobs are launched by default for each PR against dotnet/corefx:master. Click to expand
The following optional jobs are available in PRs against dotnet/corefx:master. Click to expand
Have a nice day! |
@dotnet-bot test ci please |
@dotnet-bot test outerloop Windows_NT Debug please |
@dotnet-bot test outerloop Ubuntu14.04 Debug please |
This might help kick off the coverage runs for CI but do they actually work? It was my understanding that we are still missing the pdbs so the don't actually work. |
shouldn't they work at least in Windows? cc: @stephentoub |
@weshaggard That's what I thought as well. There's no PDB's in the runtime folder, but that should be easily fixable. Want me to give it a shot? |
Yes please. |
Merging this since even if more changes are required for coverage runs to work, documentation change is required anyway. |
Fixing documentation for code coverage Commit migrated from dotnet/corefx@a84543b
Fixing docs for code coverage runs
Note: I'm not skipping CI since I'll use this PR to validate outerloop and coverage runs.
cc: @weshaggard